ArticleOncology letters2016
Multidisciplinary collaboration in gallbladder carcinoma treatment: A case report and literature review.
Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of multidisciplinary model of damage control on acute cervical spinal cord injury in winter Olympic sports.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a rare and highly aggressive disease. The diagnosis of this cancer is difficult due to its occult onset. Hence, GBC is often detected late and at an advanced stage. Although physicians and researchers are continually working to improve the treatment for advanced-stage disease, GBC is usually associated with short survival times. The present study describes a case of GBC that was first diagnosed with accompanying cholecystolithiasis at the time of cholecystectomy. Cancer relapse occurred 1.5 years after the cholecystectomy. Multidisciplinary collaboration was involved in the decision-making process for the treatment of this aggressive recurrence, and the survival time was successfully extended to 26 months. Importantly, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins had previously been detected post-cholecystectomy at a different institution, but were ignored. Relapse may have been preventable had the cancer been diagnosed when it was initially observed. Taken together, these findings suggest that multidisciplinary collaboration should be considered for the management of advanced GBC, whereby patients will benefit from improved survival times. Furthermore, it is recommended that samples obtained from patients undergoing cholecystectomy should more carefully analyzed for evidence of cancerous or precancerous tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.