Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27698427›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2017

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors in distinct circuits of the extended amygdala determine fear responsiveness to unpredictable threat.

M D Lange, T Daldrup, F Remmers, H J Szkudlarek, J Lesting, S Guggenhuber, S Ruehle, K Jüngling, T Seidenbecher, B Lutz and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Tools in Rodents to Study Cannabinoid Functions.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Fear, anxiety, and the extended amygdala-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. A Shared Threat-Anticipation Circuit Is Dynamically Engaged at Different Moments by Certain and Uncertain Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex Differences in Neural Circuits Underlying Fear Processing.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M D LangeInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
T DaldrupInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
F RemmersInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
H J SzkudlarekInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
J LestingInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
S GuggenhuberInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
S RuehleInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
K JünglingInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
T SeidenbecherInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
B LutzInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
H C PapeInstitute of Physiology I, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain circuits underlying behavioral fear have been extensively studied over the last decades. Although the vast majority of experimental studies assess fear as a transient state of apprehension in response to a discrete threat, such phasic states of fear can shift to a sustained anxious apprehension, particularly in face of diffuse cues with unpredictable environmental contingencies. Unpredictability, in turn, is considered an important variable contributing to anxiety disorders. The networks of the extended amygdala have been suggested keys to the control of phasic and sustained states of fear, although the underlying synaptic pathways and mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the endocannabinoid system acting in synaptic circuits of the extended amygdala can explain the fear response profile during exposure to unpredictable threat. Using fear training with predictable or unpredictable cues in mice, combined with local and cell-type-specific deficiency and rescue of cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors, we found that presynaptic CB1 receptors on distinct amygdala projections to bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) are both necessary and sufficient for the shift from phasic to sustained fear in response to an unpredictable threat. These results thereby identify the causal role of a defined protein in a distinct brain pathway for the temporal development of a sustained state of anxious apprehension during unpredictability of environmental influences, reminiscent of anxiety symptoms in humans.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCannabinoidsCuesEndocannabinoidsFearMaleMiceReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Reflex, StartleSeptal NucleiCannabinoidsEndocannabinoidsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

Identifiers

PMID27698427
OpenAlexW2529620065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.