Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27698345›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2017

Weight losses with low-energy formula diets in obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

W S Leslie, R Taylor, L Harris, M E J Lean

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04764279 (Rural-specific OPTIFAST Intervention - A Randomized Study for Partial Remission of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Obesity Between the Age of 18 and 65), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04764279 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Rural-specific OPTIFAST Intervention - A Randomized Study for Partial Remission of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Obesity Between the Age of 18 and 65

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarathon Family Health TeamRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, ObesityArmsOPTIFAST dietary supplement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Behavior change techniques in low-calorie and very low-calorie diet interventions for weight loss: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of meal replacements for weight loss.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W S LeslieHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
R TaylorMagnetic Resonance Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
L HarrisInstitute of Mental Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
M E J LeanHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo provide a systematic review, of published data, to compare weight losses following very low calorie (<800 kcal per day VLCD) or low-energy liquid-formula (>800 kcal per day LELD) diets, in people with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

methodsSystematic electronic searches of Medline (1946-2015) and Embase (1947-2015) to identify published studies using formula total diet replacement diets (VLCD/LELD). Random effects meta-analysis using weighted mean difference (WMD) in body weight between groups (with and without diabetes) as the summary estimate.

resultsFinal weight loss, in the five included studies, weighted for study sizes, (n=569, mean BMI=35.5-42.6 kg/m

conclusionsWeight losses with liquid-formula diets are very similar for VLCD and LELD and for obese subjects with or without T2DM. They can potentially achieve new weight loss/ maintenance targets of >15-20% for people with severe and medically complicated obesity.

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Energy IntakeHumansObesityPractice Guidelines as TopicTime FactorsWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID27698345
PMCPMC5368342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.