ReviewMedical science monitor basic research2016
Total Arterial Revascularization: Bypassing Antiquated Notions to Better Alternatives for Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Medical science monitor basic research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Effect and Prognosis of Off-Pump Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Trial
- Endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive versus sternotomy total arterial multivessel bypass grafting.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- The correlation between the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease in patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- The Role of Stem Cells in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- A comparative review of the outcomes of using arterial versus venous conduits in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Review
- Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A 10-Year Experience.Chinese medical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total arterial revascularization is the leading trend in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Adding to its superiority to vein conduits, arteries allow for a high degree of versatility and long-term patency, while minimizing the need for reintervention. This is especially important for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, as well as young patients. However, arterial revascularization has come a long way before being widely appreciated, with some yet unresolved debates, and advances that never cease to impress. In this review, we discuss the evolution of this surgical technique and its clinical success, as well as its most conspicuous limitations in light of accumulated published date from decades of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.