Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27697950›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2016

Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS): dissemination and implementation research.

Lisa Henriksen, Kurt M Ribisl, Todd Rogers, Sarah Moreland-Russell, Dianne M Barker, Nikie Sarris Esquivel, Brett Loomis, Erin Crew, Todd Combs

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04279483 (Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled343ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking, CigaretteArmsTobacco retailer, Non-tobacco retailer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review investigating policy design and implementation of US state and local policy to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the Presence and Type of Premium Cigar Retailers With Neighborhood Sociodemographic Correlates in the United States, 2019-2021.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  6. The emergence of e-cigarette retail shops in a regulated tobacco control environment.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethnicity and the mechanisms of point-of-sale e-cigarette marketing's influence on behavior: A longitudinal study.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Article
  10. Price Promotions of E-Liquid Products Sold in Online Stores.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Reduce Tobacco Product Availability and Retailer Advertising.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Comprehensive Qualitative Review of Studies Evaluating the Impact of Local US Laws Restricting the Sale of Flavored and Menthol Tobacco Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Review
  17. Assessment of IQOS Marketing Strategies at Points-of-Sale in Israel at a Time of Regulatory Transition.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa HenriksenStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Kurt M RibislGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Todd RogersRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah Moreland-RussellCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St., Louis, Missouri, USA.
Dianne M BarkerBarker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants, Calabasas, California, USA.
Nikie Sarris EsquivelRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Brett LoomisRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Erin CrewStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Todd CombsCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St., Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Monitoring and Assessing the Impact of Tax and Price Policies on US Tobacco UseU01CA154248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CHALOUPKA, FRANK JOSEPH · 2011 to 2015
$6.6M
Maximizing state & local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of saleU01CA154281 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE, LUKE, DOUGLAS A · 2011 to 2015
$6.3M
Coordinating Center for the Advancement of Tobacco Control Research and PracticeU01CA154241 · NCI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI FARRELLY, MATTHEW C · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154241NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154248NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS) was designed to characterise the availability, placement, promotion and price of tobacco products, with items chosen for relevance to regulating the retail tobacco environment. This study describes the process to develop the STARS instrument and protocol employed by a collaboration of US government agencies, US state tobacco control programmes (TCPs), advocacy organisations, public health attorneys and researchers from the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control (SCTC) Research Initiative.

methodsTo evaluate dissemination and early implementation experiences, we conducted telephone surveys with state TCP leaders (n=50, response rate=100%), and with individuals recruited via a STARS download registry on the SCTC website. Website registrants were surveyed within 6 months of the STARS release (n=105, response rate=66%) and again after ∼5 months (retention rate=62%).

resultsAmong the state TCPs, 42 reported conducting any retail marketing surveillance, with actual or planned STARS use in 34 of these states and in 12 of the 17 states where marketing surveillance was not previously reported. Within 6 months of the STARS release, 21% of surveyed registrants reported using STARS and 35% were likely/very likely to use it in the next 6 months. To investigate implementation fidelity, we compared data collected by self-trained volunteers and by trained professionals, the latter method being more typically in retail marketing surveillance studies. Results suggest high or moderate reliability for most STARS measures.

conclusionThe study concludes with examples of states that used STARS to inform policy change.

Indexed as

CommerceCooperative BehaviorHumansInformation DisseminationInternetMarketingReproducibility of ResultsResearchSmokingSmoking PreventionSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsUnited StatesAdvertising and PromotionEnvironmentPricePublic policySurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID27697950
PMCPMC5099212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.