ArticleJournal of experimental botany2016
A flow cytometric method for estimating S-phase duration in plants.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maize chromatin introgression's effect in oat × maize addition lines.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- Optimizing scheduling in dual-pulse nucleoside labeling experiments for cell-cycle analysis.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Review
- A Protocol for Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Replication Timing in Intact Root Tips.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- The Role of Topoisomerase II in DNA Repair and Recombination inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Tools for Assessing Cell-Cycle Progression in Plants.Plant & cell physiology · 2021Review
- Cellular and transcriptomic analyses reveal two-staged chloroplast biogenesis underpinning photosynthesis build-up in the wheat leaf.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Loss of Small-RNA-Directed DNA Methylation in the Plant Cell Cycle Promotes Germline Reprogramming and Somaclonal Variation.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Comparing DNA replication programs reveals large timing shifts at centromeres of endocycling cells in maize roots.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of the Arabidopsis Replication Timing Program.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- Visualization of the Nucleolus Using Ethynyl Uridine.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Genomic Analysis of the DNA Replication Timing Program during Mitotic S Phase in Maize (The Plant cell · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The duration of the DNA synthesis stage (S phase) of the cell cycle is fundamental in our understanding of cell cycle kinetics, cell proliferation, and DNA replication timing programs. Most S-phase duration estimates that exist for plants are based on indirect measurements. We present a method for directly estimating S-phase duration by pulse-labeling root tips or actively dividing suspension cells with the halogenated thymidine analog 5-ethynl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) and analyzing the time course of replication with bivariate flow cytometry. The transition between G
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.