Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27697594›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016

Drug repurposing for glioblastoma based on molecular subtypes.

Yang Chen, Rong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Network-based drug repurposing for HPV-associated cervical cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interrogating Patient-level Genomics and Mouse Phenomics towards Understanding Cytokines in Colorectal Cancer Metastasis.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yang ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States.
Rong XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States. Electronic address: rxx@case.edu.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Rapid reverse translational drug repositioningDP2HD084068 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent multi-platform analysis by The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four distinct molecular subtypes for glioblastoma (GBM) and demonstrated that the subtypes correlate with clinical phenotypes and treatment responses. In this study, we developed a computational drug repurposing approach to predict GBM drugs based on the molecular subtypes. Our approach leverages the genomic signature for each GBM subtype, and integrates the human cancer genomics with mouse phenotype data to identify the opportunity of reusing the FDA-approved agents to treat specific GBM subtypes. Specifically, we first constructed the phenotype profile for each GBM subtype using their genomic signatures. For each approved drug, we also constructed a phenotype profile using the drug target genes. Then we developed an algorithm to match and prioritize drugs based on their phenotypic similarities to the GBM subtypes. Our approach is highly generalizable for other disorders if provided with a list of disorder-specific genes. We first evaluated the approach in predicting drugs for the whole GBM. For a combined set of approved, potential and off-label GBM drugs, we achieved a median rank of 9.3%, which is significantly higher (p<e

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug RepositioningAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGenomicsGlioblastomaHumansMicePhenotypeDrug discoveryGlioblastomaMolecular subtypesPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID27697594
PMCPMC6146394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.