Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27697080›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2017

Evidence of leptospirosis in the kidneys and serum of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States.

K Pedersen, T D Anderson, S N Bevins, K L Pabilonia, P N Whitley, D R Virchow, T Gidlewski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and serological detection ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular and Serological Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K PedersenU.S. Department of Agriculture,Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,Wildlife Services,Fort Collins,CO,USA.
T D AndersonColorado State University,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology,College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,Fort Collins,CO,USA.
S N BevinsU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,Wildlife Services,National Wildlife Research Center,Fort Collins, CO,USA.
K L PabiloniaColorado State University,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology,College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,Fort Collins,CO,USA.
P N WhitleyU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,Wildlife Services,Oklahoma City,OK,USA.
D R VirchowU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,Wildlife Services,Albuquerque,NM,USA.
T GidlewskiU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,Wildlife Services,National Wildlife Research Center,Fort Collins, CO,USA.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is the most widespread zoonosis in humans worldwide. In the United States, widespread detection of antibodies to leptospirosis have been identified in feral swine (Sus scrofa) with the highest detection of serovars, Bratislava, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona. Over the past few years, feral swine populations have expanded their geographical range and distribution in the United States with reports in at least 39 of 50 states. Since feral swine serve as reservoirs for serovars that can infect humans, it is important to understand the risk of transmission. In order to learn more about the probability that feral swine shed infectious leptospires, we collected kidneys and paired serum when possible from 677 feral swine in 124 counties of 29 states. These counties had previously been identified as antibody positive for Leptospira interrogans serovars Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae or Pomona. Although exposure to these same six serovars of leptospirosis continued to be high (53% overall) in the counties we sampled, we detected leptospiral DNA in only 3·4% of feral swine kidneys tested. Based on these results, it appears that although feral swine can serve as a source of infection to humans, especially in those who are more likely to encounter them directly such as wildlife biologists, veterinarians, and hunters, the risk may be relatively low. However, further studies to examine the relationship between leptospiral shedding in the urine and kidneys in addition to culturing the organism are recommended in order to better understand the risk associated with feral swine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialDNA, BacterialFemaleKidneyLeptospiraLeptospirosisMaleSerumSwineSwine DiseasesUnited StatesAntibodies, BacterialDNA, BacterialFeral swinekidneyLeptospiraleptospirosisSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID27697080
PMCPMC9507390
OpenAlexW2529681035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.