Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27696720›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2017

Association of prenatal lipid-based nutritional supplementation with fetal growth in rural Gambia.

William Johnson, Momodou K Darboe, Fatou Sosseh, Patrick Nshe, Andrew M Prentice, Sophie E Moore

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William JohnsonMRC Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK.
Momodou K DarboeMRC International Nutrition Group, MRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, Banjul, The Gambia.
Fatou SossehMRC International Nutrition Group, MRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, Banjul, The Gambia.
Patrick NsheMRC International Nutrition Group, MRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, Banjul, The Gambia.
Andrew M PrenticeMRC International Nutrition Group, MRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, Banjul, The Gambia.
Sophie E MooreMRC Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK.
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMMRC Human Nutrition Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A760-5QX00Medical Research Council MC_U123261345Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UP_1005/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal supplementation with protein-energy (PE) and/or multiple-micronutrients (MMNs) may improve fetal growth, but trials of lipid-based nutritional supplements (LNSs) have reported inconsistent results. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of non-primary outcomes in a trial in Gambia, with the aim to test the associations of LNS with fetal growth and explore how efficacy varies depending on nutritional status. The sample comprised 620 pregnant women in an individually randomized, partially blinded trial with four arms: (a) iron and folic acid (FeFol) tablet (usual care, referent group), (b) MMN tablet, (c) PE LNS, and (d) PE + MMN LNS. Analysis of variance examined unadjusted differences in fetal biometry z-scores at 20 and 30 weeks and neonatal anthropometry z-scores, while regression tested for modification of intervention-outcome associations by season and maternal height, body mass index, and weight gain. Despite evidence of between-arm differences in some fetal biometry, z-scores at birth were not greater in the intervention arms than the FeFol arm (e.g., birth weight z-scores: FeFol -0.71, MMN -0.63, PE -0.64, PE + MMN -0.62; group-wise p = .796). In regression analyses, intervention associations with birth weight and head circumference were modified by maternal weight gain between booking and 30 weeks gestation (e.g., PE + MMN associations with birth weight were +0.462 z-scores (95% CI [0.097, 0.826]) in the highest quartile of weight gain but -0.099 z-scores (-0.459, 0.260) in the lowest). In conclusion, we found no strong evidence that a prenatal LNS intervention was associated with better fetal growth in the whole sample.

Indexed as

Birth WeightDietary SupplementsFetal DevelopmentMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentAdultDietDietary ProteinsFemaleFolic AcidGambiaGestational AgeHumansInfantIron, DietaryLinear ModelsDietary ProteinsFolic AcidIron, DietaryLipidsMicronutrientsfetal growthgestational weight gainlipid-based nutritional supplementrandomized control trialseasonalityThe Gambia

Identifiers

PMID27696720
PMCPMC5396370
OpenAlexW2528066677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.