ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016
Newborns still lack drug data to guide therapy.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Dose-Related Adverse Drug Events in Neonates: Recognition and Assessment.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Review
- The Utility of Pharmacometric Models in Clinical Pharmacology Research in Infants.Current pharmacology reports · 2020Article
- Large differences in neonatal drug use between NICUs are common practice: time for consensus?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Comparison of antibiotic dosing recommendations for neonatal sepsis from established reference sources.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- The Need for Pediatric Drug Development.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
- Newborns still lack drug data to guide therapy.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.