Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27696325›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2016

What is new in idiopathic clubfoot?

Ryan M O'Shea, Coleen S Sabatini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The molecular genetics of human appendicular skeleton.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rare andJournal of medical genetics · 2020
    Article
  13. The genetics of isolated and syndromic clubfoot.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan M O'SheaSan Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, 450 Stanyan Street, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Coleen S SabatiniUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, 747 52nd Street, OPC 1st Floor, Oakland, CA, 94609, USA. Coleen.sabatini@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic clubfoot has a tremendous worldwide prevalence. If left untreated, the deformity has severely disabling effects on mobility and quality of life. Given its prevalence and significance, numerous studies are published on this condition every year. In this article, we attempt to highlight important themes and findings of studies published on idiopathic clubfoot over the past 3 years.

Indexed as

ClubfootCongenital foot deformityPediatric footPediatric orthopedicsPonseti methodTalipes equinovarus

Identifiers

PMID27696325
PMCPMC5127955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.