ArticleRadiological physics and technology2017
Radiation dose optimization for the bolus tracking technique in abdominal computed tomography: usefulness of real-time iterative reconstruction for monitoring scan.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Split-bolus injection protocol with optimized timings of contrast medium injection and CT scanning for 3D CT angio-venography before laparoscopic gastrectomy.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to optimize the monitoring dose, obtained using the conventional filtered back projection (FBP) method and iterative reconstruction algorithms, for the bolus tracking technique. A phantom study was performed to assess the effect of the scan start time in patients grouped according to different body weights. An oval torso phantom was used for simulating the time enhancement curve of the bolus tracking technique. To reproduce image noise levels in the two body weight groups, the phantom diameter was adjusted with a water-equivalent material. The tube currents were 10, 20, 30, and 50 mA. The monitoring scan was performed with the conventional FBP method and real-time adaptive iterative dose reduction by three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D). The results at different doses were compared with those at 50 mA. The volume computed tomography dose index was 1.31, 2.65, 3.93, and 6.56 mGy at tube currents of 10, 20, 30, and 50 mA, respectively. The scan start time, reconstructed using FBP, was significantly faster at 10 and 20 mA in group A (50-59 kg) and at 20 mA in group B (≥80 kg). The CT values in the region of interest could not be measured at 10 mA because of artifacts. With real-time AIDR 3D, both groups showed no significant differences between the measurements obtained at 30 or 20 mA and those obtained at 50 mA. Our study demonstrated that the real-time AIDR 3D algorithm improved the accuracy of the CT measurements with the bolus tracking technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27696286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.