Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27696276›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2017

Risk factors for postoperative complications in robotic general surgery.

Giovanni Fantola, Laurent Brunaud, Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi, Adeline Germain, Ahmet Ayav, Laurent Bresler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07176052 (Expectation, Pain Outcomes, and Analgesic Efficacy Following Oncology Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07176052 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Expectation, Pain Outcomes, and Analgesic Efficacy Following Oncology Abdominal Surgery: A Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2025 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsCancer, Hepatic, Cancer, Esophagus, Cancer, PancreasArmscancer surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanni FantolaDepartment of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, Endocrine, and Surgical Oncology, CHU Nancy-Hospital Brabois Adultes, University de Lorraine, 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Laurent BrunaudDepartment of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, Endocrine, and Surgical Oncology, CHU Nancy-Hospital Brabois Adultes, University de Lorraine, 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. l.brunaud@chru-nancy.fr.
Phi-Linh Nguyen-ThiClinical Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, INSERM, CIC-EC1433, CHU Nancy, Pôle S2R, University de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Adeline GermainDepartment of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, Endocrine, and Surgical Oncology, CHU Nancy-Hospital Brabois Adultes, University de Lorraine, 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Ahmet AyavDepartment of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, Endocrine, and Surgical Oncology, CHU Nancy-Hospital Brabois Adultes, University de Lorraine, 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Laurent BreslerDepartment of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, Endocrine, and Surgical Oncology, CHU Nancy-Hospital Brabois Adultes, University de Lorraine, 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feasibility and safety of robotically assisted procedures in general surgery have been reported from various groups worldwide. Because postoperative complications may lead to longer hospital stays and higher costs overall, analysis of risk factors for postoperative surgical complications in this subset of patients is clinically relevant. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity after robotic surgical procedures in general surgery. We performed an observational monocentric retrospective study. All consecutive robotic surgical procedures from November 2001 to December 2013 were included. One thousand consecutive general surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall postoperative morbidity and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien >III) rates were 20.4 and 6 %, respectively. This included a conversion rate of 4.4 %, reoperation rate of 4.5 %, and mortality rate of 0.2 %. Multivariate analysis showed that ASA score >3 [OR 1.7; 95 % CI (1.2-2.4)], hematocrit value <38 [OR 1.6; 95 % CI (1.1-2.2)], previous abdominal surgery [OR 1.5; 95 % CI (1-2)], advanced dissection [OR 5.8; 95 % CI (3.1-10.6)], and multiquadrant surgery [OR 2.5; 95 % CI (1.7-3.8)] remained independent risk factors for overall postoperative morbidity. It also showed that advanced dissection [OR 4.4; 95 % CI (1.9-9.6)] and multiquadrant surgery [OR 4.4; 95 % CI (2.3-8.5)] remained independent risk factors for major postoperative morbidity (Clavien >III). This study identifies independent risk factors for postoperative overall and major morbidity in robotic general surgery. Because these factors independently impacted postoperative complications, we believe they could be taken into account in future studies comparing conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures in general surgery.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContraindications, ProcedureFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresROC CurveLaparoscopyMorbidityMortalityPostoperative complicationsRisk factorsRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.