Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27696275›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2016

School Bullies' Intention to Change Behavior Following Teacher Interventions: Effects of Empathy Arousal, Condemning of Bullying, and Blaming of the Perpetrator.

Claire F Garandeau, Annina Vartio, Elisa Poskiparta, Christina Salmivalli

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A Large-Scale Replication of the Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inter-parental conflict and empathy in early adolescence as predictors of dating violence perpetration in adolescence and adulthood.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  9. Interventions That Failed: Factors Associated with the Continuation of Bullying After a Targeted Intervention.International journal of bullying prevention : an official publication of the International Bullying Prevention Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Different Approaches to Address Bullying in KiVa Schools: Adherence to Guidelines, Strategies Implemented, and Outcomes Obtained.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. School Bullying in Compulsory and Advanced Secondary Education. Determining Factors in its Intervention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire F GarandeauDepartment of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.f.garandeau@uu.nl.
Annina VartioÅbo Akademi, Turku, Finland.
Elisa PoskipartaUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Christina SalmivalliUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIÅbo Akademi University · FIUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how bullies' perceptions of how they were treated by a teacher (or other school personnel) during discussions aimed at putting an end to bullying influenced their intention to change their behavior. After each discussion, which took place as part of the implementation of an anti-bullying program, bullies anonymously reported the extent to which they felt that the teacher aroused their empathy for the victim, condemned their behavior, or blamed them. Half of the schools implementing the program were instructed to handle these discussions in a confrontational way-telling the bully that his behavior is not tolerated-while the other half were instructed to use a non-confronting approach. Schools were randomly assigned to one of the two approaches. A total of 341 cases (188 in primary and 153 in secondary schools) handled in 28 Finnish schools were analyzed. Regression analyses showed that attempts at making bullies feel empathy for the victim and condemning their behavior both increased bullies' intention to stop. Blaming the bully had no significant effect. Bullies' intention to change was the lowest when both empathy-arousal and condemning behavior were low. The effects of empathy arousal were stronger when condemning the behavior was low (and vice versa), suggesting that teachers tackling bullying should make sure to use at least one of these strategies. When choosing not to raise the child's empathy, clear reprobation of the behavior is key.

Indexed as

IntentionSocial Control, InformalBullyingChildEmpathyFemaleFinlandHumansMaleProgram EvaluationRegression AnalysisSelf EfficacyStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-bullying programBullyingEmpathyInterventionSchool

Identifiers

PMID27696275
PMCPMC5065969
OpenAlexW2524548454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.