ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2016
Effects of point mutations on the thermostability of B. subtilis lipase: investigating nonadditivity.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetically engineered lipases: advances in expression and upscaling for industrial applications.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Repercussions of the Calpain Cleavage-Related Missense Mutations in the Cytosolic Domains of Human Integrin-β Subunits on the Calpain-Integrin Signaling Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The PyInteraph Workflow for the Study of Interaction Networks From Protein Structural Ensembles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Changes of Thermostability, Organic Solvent, and pH Stability inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Insight into microtubule destabilization mechanism of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl indanone derivatives using molecular dynamics simulation and conformational modes analysis.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular level understanding of mutational effects on stability and activity of enzymes is challenging particularly when several point mutations are incorporated during the directed evolution experiments. In our earlier study, we have suggested the lack of consistency in the effect of point mutations incorporated during the initial generations of directed evolution experiments, towards conformational stabilization of B. subtilis lipase mutants of later generations. Here, we report that the cumulative point mutations incorporated in mutants 2M (with two point mutations) to 6M (with six point mutations) possibly do not retain their original stabilizing nature in the most thermostable 12M mutant (with 12 point mutations). We have carried out MD simulations using structures incorporating reversal of different sets of point mutations to assess their effect on the conformational stability and activity of 12M. Our analysis has revealed that reversal of certain point mutations in 12M had little effect on its conformational stability, suggesting that these mutations were probably inconsequential towards the thermostability of the 12M mutant. Interestingly these mutations involved evolutionarily conserved residues. On the other hand, some of the other point mutations incorporated in nonconserved regions, appeared to contribute significantly towards the conformational stability and/or activity of 12M. Based on the analysis of dynamics of in silico mutants generated using the consensus sequence, we identified experimentally verifiable residue positions to further increase the conformational stability and activity of the 12M mutant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.