Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27696219›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2017

A mixed methods study of ruminant brucellosis in central-eastern Tunisia.

Mohamed Barkallah, Yaakoub Gharbi, Sonia Zormati, Nesrine Karkouch, Zouhir Mallek, Michel Gautier, Radhouane Gdoura, Imen Fendri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Hybrid Whole Genomes ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Detection ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed BarkallahToxicology-Microbiology and Environmental Health Unit (UR11ES70), Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia. mohamedbarkallah@gmail.com.
Yaakoub GharbiToxicology-Microbiology and Environmental Health Unit (UR11ES70), Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Sonia ZormatiVeterinary Research of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Nesrine KarkouchToxicology-Microbiology and Environmental Health Unit (UR11ES70), Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Zouhir MallekVeterinary Research of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Michel GautierEquipe Microbiologie de l'œuf et des Ovoproduits (MICOV), Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, (UMR1253) Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'Œuf, Rennes, France.
Radhouane GdouraToxicology-Microbiology and Environmental Health Unit (UR11ES70), Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Imen FendriToxicology-Microbiology and Environmental Health Unit (UR11ES70), Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
University of Sfax · TNLaboratoire Science & technologie du Lait & de l'œuf · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we conducted an investigation to determine the true prevalence of bovine and ovine brucellosis in central-eastern Tunisia. A total of 1134 veterinary samples taken from 130 ruminant herds were screened for brucellosis using IS711-based real-time PCR assay. Sera collected from the ruminants were tested using the Rose Bengal test and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Based on serological and molecular results, the true adjusted animal population level prevalence was 23.5 % in cattle, against 13.5 % in sheep. In addition, the true adjusted herd level prevalence of brucellosis was 55.6 % in cattle and 21.8 % in sheep. A statistically significant association was found between vaginal and milk shedding for ruminants. In addition, our results showed that Brucella abortus could be responsible for bovine and ovine brucellosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis at the animal population level indicated that age and origin variables were important risk factors for cattle. However, age and abortion variables were found to be associated with ovine brucellosis. At the herd level, risk factors for Brucella positivity were as follows: abortion and herd composition for cattle against herd composition, mortality rates, and hygiene for sheep. Animal hygiene, food quality, and sanitary practices on the farm should be applied as strategies to control brucellosis in herds.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryAnimalsBrucella abortusBrucellosisBrucellosis, BovineCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGeographyMilkMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialBrucellosisReal-time PCRRisk factorsRuminantsSerological tests

Identifiers

PMID27696219
OpenAlexW2526868538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.