ArticleObesity surgery2017
Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Antrum Resection Margin at Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manometric and pH-monitoring changes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Antral Preserving Versus Antral Resecting Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients with Severe Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Food Tolerance After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Total Antral Resection.Obesity surgery · 2019Trial
- Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
- Comparison of Mid- and Long-term Outcomes of Antrum-Resecting Versus Antrum-Preserving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Sleeve gastrectomy with antral resection provides more effective weight loss in patients with super obesity.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Based on Propensity Matching Scores: Comparison of the Mid-term Outcomes of Two Bariatric Surgeries for the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Thyroid Hormone Changes After Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Antral Preservation.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Water Tolerance After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
- Effect of Resection Distance from Pylorus on Weight Loss Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2019Article
- Update: 10 Years of Sleeve Gastrectomy-the First 103 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- The role of extended antral resection on weight loss and metabolic response after sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in obesity surgery. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery include rapid recovery. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of different resection margin lengths from the pylorus in LSG.
methodsThis retrospective study included 152 patients who underwent LSG from January 2011 to October 2014. The antrum was resected 2 cm from the pylorus in 84 patients (group A) and 6 cm from the pylorus in 68 patients (group B). The patients' demographics, staple line distance, complications, sex, age, body mass index loss, length of hospital stay, and comorbidities were retrospectively reviewed.
resultsThe patients comprised 104 women (68.4 %) and 48 men (32.6 %) with a mean age of 41.2 years (range, 28-53 years). The percent total and excess weight loss were statistically significant in both groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Weight loss was significantly greater in group A than that in B at 6 and 12 months, but the difference at 24 months was not statistically significant. The results of pH monitoring showed significantly lower scores in group A than those in B at 6 and 12 months, but no difference at 24 months.
conclusionLSG is an effective procedure with good short-term outcomes. Both procedures described herein are equally effective with respect to the patient's return to daily activities. Increasing the distance from the resection line to the pylorus is associated with better weight loss but slightly increased symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease without a significant difference in complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.