ArticlePediatric surgery international2017
Modified PATIO repair for urethrocutaneous fistula post-hypospadias repair: operative technique and outcomes.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Waterproofing layers' for urethrocutaneous fistula repair after hypospadias surgery: evidence synthesis with systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Analysis of Surgical Methods for Distal, Mid-, and Proximal Shaft Hypospadias in Young Males: A Prospective Study on Postoperative Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Risk factors for failed urethrocutaneous fistula repair after transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty in pediatric hypospadias.International urology and nephrology · 2018Article
- Defining the Indications of PATIO Technique for Urethrocutaneous Fistula Repair.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo describe a modification of PATIO repair for urethrocutaneous fistula repair and evaluate its outcome.
methodsWe studied 15 boys who underwent modified PATIO repair from Jan 2010 to Sept 2015. Parameters studied included age, type of hypospadias, age at first urethroplasty, hypospadias repair technique, number of urethroplasties required, location of fistula, time gap between urethroplasty and fistula repair, method of fistula repair, and outcome of fistula repair.
resultsMean age of the studied patients was 67.6 months (38-139). Type of hypospadias was Coronal = 3, subcoronal = 8, mid-penile = 2, prominal penile = 1, and penoscrotal = 1. Ten patients had single urethroplasty, while two patients had two urethroplasties, details not available for three patients. Average age at urethroplasty was 43.4 months (18-110). 12 patients had Snodgrass repair, Mathieu = 1 patient, tubularised plate repair = 1 patient, and unknown = 1 patient. Location of fistula was coronal in nine patients and subcoronal in six patients. Average operative time was 47.2 min (30-68). Follow-up is available for 12 patients out of which 2 patients had recurrent fistula, one of which was successfully treated by the redo modified PATIO method.
conclusionModified PATIO method is technically easy method for urethrocutaneous fistula repair, with less operating time and good postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.