Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27695498›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2016

Magnetic resonance imaging of neonates in the magnetic resonance compatible incubator.

Monika Bekiesińska-Figatowska, Ewa Helwich, Magdalena Rutkowska, Joanna Stankiewicz, Iwona Terczyńska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expert consensus on the clinical practice of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monika Bekiesińska-FigatowskaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa HelwichClinic of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena RutkowskaClinic of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna StankiewiczIntensive Care and Anesthesiology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona TerczyńskaClinic of Neurology of Children and Adolescents, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe authors present the first experience in neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations using an MR compatible incubator ( MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-nine examinations of 47 newborns (20 girls, 27 boys) were performed using the GE Signa HDxt 1.5T system and

resultsThirty-two neonates were prematurely born (68.1%) at gestational age 23-37 weeks, mean: 29.9 weeks. They were examined at 26 weeks postmenstrual age to 1 month corrected age, mean: 37.5 weeks. Body weight of newborns on the study day was 600-4300 g, mean: 2724 g. Seventeen (34.7%) children were examined in physiological sleep, 32 (65.3%) anesthetized. In none of them did anesthesiological complications or disease worsening occur. In 43 (91.5%) children brain MRI was performed, in 4 (8.5%) MRI of the spinal cord and canal and of the abdomen/pelvis. In children prenatally examined by MRI, the

conclusionsThe

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingMR compatible incubator (INC)neonates

Identifiers

PMID27695498
PMCPMC5016588
OpenAlexW2522837183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.