Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27695395›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Coordination Dynamics in Cognitive Neuroscience.

Steven L Bressler, J A Scott Kelso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven L BresslerCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL, USA.
J A Scott KelsoCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic UniversityBoca Raton, FL, USA; Intelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster UniversityDerry/Londonderry, Northern Ireland.

Funding

Neuromarkers of Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach competing renewal forR01MH080838 · NIMH · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI KELSO, J A SCOTT, TOGNOLI, EMMANUELLE · 2008 to 2018
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many researchers and clinicians in cognitive neuroscience hold to a modular view of cognitive function in which the cerebral cortex operates by the activation of areas with circumscribed elementary cognitive functions. Yet an ongoing paradigm shift to a dynamic network perspective is underway. This new viewpoint treats cortical function as arising from the coordination dynamics within and between cortical regions. Cortical coordination dynamics arises due to the unidirectional influences imposed on a cortical area by inputs from other areas that project to it, combined with the projection reciprocity that characterizes cortical connectivity and gives rise to reentrant processing. As a result, cortical dynamics exhibits both segregative and integrative tendencies and gives rise to both cooperative and competitive relations within and between cortical areas that are hypothesized to underlie the emergence of cognition in brains.

Indexed as

cerebral cortexcomputational contextevent-related potentialHKB modelinterareal interactionlocal field potentialneuronal communicationrelative coordination

Identifiers

PMID27695395
PMCPMC5023665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.