ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2016
Influence of
Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in Infants and Children With Acute Diarrhea.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2020Trial
- Review
- Non-Conventional Yeasts with Probiotic Potential: Diversity, Functional Role, Sustainable Bioprocessing and Local Relevance.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Article
- Cross-kingdom microbial interactions in the gut during inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Application ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for medical applications.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Effects of a polyphenol-rich extract blend, probiotics, and hydrolyzed fiber on quality of life and gut health markers in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Non-lactic acid bacteria probiotics isolated from intestine or various circumstances.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- The preventive effects ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Targeted delivery of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii to the extracellular matrix enhances gut residence time and recovery in murine colitis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Can the Evidence-Based Use of Probiotics (Notably Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) Mitigate the Clinical Effects of Antibiotic-Associated Dysbiosis?Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Eukaryotes may play an important ecological role in the gut microbiome of Graves' disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Probiotics for Prevention and Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Epilepsy, gut microbiota, and circadian rhythm.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Potential benefits of yeastFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe probiotic
aimThe aim of this review is to summarize the experimental studies elucidating the molecular and immunological mechanisms by which these clinically proven effects are archived, with an emphasis on the gut-associated immune system. The main focus is laid on anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory action of
methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed/PubMed Central for the effects of RESULTS AND
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.