Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27695084›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Bacterial Communities in the Rhizospheres of Three Mangrove Tree Species from Beilun Estuary, China.

Peng Wu, Xiaofei Xiong, Zhanzhou Xu, Chuqian Lu, Hao Cheng, Xiangli Lyu, Jinghuai Zhang, Wei He, Wei Deng, Yihua Lyu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Isolation and Genomics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peng WuSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofei XiongSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanzhou XuSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Chuqian LuSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Hao ChengState Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangli LyuSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Jinghuai ZhangSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Wei HeSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Wei DengSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Yihua LyuSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Quansheng LouSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.
Yiguo HongState Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hongda FangSouth China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial communities played important roles in the high productivity mangrove ecosystem. In this study, we investigated the vertical distributions of rhizosphere bacteria from three mangrove species (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Kandelia candel and Aegiceras corniculatum) in Beilun Estuary, China using high throughput DNA pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Phylogenetic analysis showed that bacterial communities from mangrove rhizosphere sediments were dominated by Proteobacteria (mostly Deltaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria), followed by Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes and Acidobacteria. However, the ANOVA analysis on Shannon and Chao1 indices indicated that bacterial communities among sediments of the three mangrove species varied more strongly than the sampling depths. In addition, the PCA result demonstrated that the bacterial communities could be separated into three groups according to the mangrove species. Moreover, the dominated orders Rhodospirillales, GCA004 and envOPS12 were significantly different among sediments of the three mangrove species. The results of this study provided valuable information about the distribution feature of rhizosphere bacteria from Chinese mangrove plants and shed insights into biogeochemical transformations driven by bacteria in rhizosphere sediments.

Indexed as

RhizosphereTreesBacteriaBiodiversityChinaDNA, BacterialEcosystemGeologic SedimentsPhylogenyPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27695084
PMCPMC5047532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.