ArticlePloS one2016
Comparison of Confocal and Super-Resolution Reflectance Imaging of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-point-based analysis of gold nanoparticles in MCF-7 cells following ultrasound irradiation: quantitative and label-free intracellular characterization.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Coordinated and compartmentalized functions of CAII and CAIV establish a dual pH-regulatory mechanism essential for sperm maturation and capacitation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- An optimized approach to study nanoscale sarcomere structure utilizing super-resolution microscopy with nanobodies.PloS one · 2024Article
- DBlink: dynamic localization microscopy in super spatiotemporal resolution via deep learning.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Unveiling the nanotoxicological aspects of Se nanomaterials differing in size and morphology.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- RNA-binding FMRP and Staufen sequentially regulate the Coracle scaffold to control synaptic glutamate receptor and bouton development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Optical Microscopy Systems for the Detection of Unlabeled Nanoparticles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- Recent Progress in Near-Infrared Organic Electroluminescent Materials.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2021Review
- Intratumoral administration of astatine-211-labeled gold nanoparticle for alpha therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- Revealing Inflammatory Indications Induced by Titanium Alloy Wear Debris in Periprosthetic Tissue by Label-Free Correlative High-Resolution Ion, Electron and Optical Microspectroscopy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Reflectance structured illumination imaging of internalized cerium oxide nanoparticles modulating dose-dependent reactive oxygen species in breast cancer cells.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2020Article
- Surface Chemistry-Dependent Evolution of the Nanomaterial Corona on TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Future trends and emerging issues for nanodelivery systems in oral and oropharyngeal cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The potential for human exposure to manufactured nanoparticles (NPs) has increased in recent years, in part through the incorporation of engineered particles into a wide range of commercial goods and medical applications. NP are ideal candidates for use as therapeutic and diagnostic tools within biomedicine, however concern exists regarding their efficacy and safety. Thus, developing techniques for the investigation of NP uptake into cells is critically important. Current intracellular NP investigations rely on the use of either Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), which provides ultrahigh resolution, but involves cumbersome sample preparation rendering the technique incompatible with live cell imaging, or fluorescent labelling, which suffers from photobleaching, poor bioconjugation and, often, alteration of NP surface properties. Reflected light imaging provides an alternative non-destructive label free technique well suited, but not limited to, the visualisation of NP uptake within model systems, such as cells. Confocal reflectance microscopy provides optical sectioning and live imaging capabilities, with little sample preparation. However confocal microscopy is diffraction limited, thus the X-Y resolution is restricted to ~250 nm, substantially larger than the <100 nm size of NPs. Techniques such as super-resolution light microscopy overcome this fundamental limitation, providing increased X-Y resolution. The use of Reflectance SIM (R-SIM) for NP imaging has previously only been demonstrated on custom built microscopes, restricting the widespread use and limiting NP investigations. This paper demonstrates the use of a commercial SIM microscope for the acquisition of super-resolution reflectance data with X-Y resolution of 115 nm, a greater than two-fold increase compared to that attainable with RCM. This increase in resolution is advantageous for visualising small closely spaced structures, such as NP clusters, previously unresolvable by RCM. This is advantageous when investigating the subcellular trafficking of NP within fluorescently labelled cellular compartments. NP signal can be observed using RCM, R-SIM and TEM and a direct comparison is presented. Each of these techniques has its own benefits and limitations; RCM and R-SIM provide novel complementary information while the combination of modalities provides a unique opportunity to gain additional information regarding NP uptake. The use of multiple imaging methods therefore greatly enhances the range of NPs that can be studied under label-free conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.