ArticleScientific reports2016
Multi-Pass Adaptive Voting for Nuclei Detection in Histopathological Images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Deep Learning-Based Computational Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma in Pleural Fluid.Cells · 2023Article
- A Soft Label Deep Learning to Assist Breast Cancer Target Therapy and Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis.Cancers · 2022Article
- Global Increase in Breast Cancer Incidence: Risk Factors and Preventive Measures.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Deep Learning on Histopathology Images for Breast Cancer Classification: A Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- CellSpatialGraph: Integrate hierarchical phenotyping and graph modeling to characterize spatial architecture in tumor microenvironment on digital pathology.Software impacts · 2021Article
- Feature-driven local cell graph (FLocK): New computational pathology-based descriptors for prognosis of lung cancer and HPV status of oropharyngeal cancers.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- Evaluating Cancer-Related Biomarkers Based on Pathological Images: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Multi-aspect testing and ranking inference to quantify dimorphism in the cytoarchitecture of cerebellum of male, female and intersex individuals: a model applied to bovine brains.Brain structure & function · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital breast pathology: Techniques and applications.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Review
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Cell segmentation methods for label-free contrast microscopy: review and comprehensive comparison.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018Article
- Designing multifunctional cancer-targeted nanosystem for magnetic resonance molecular imaging-guided theranostics of lung cancer.Drug delivery · 2018Article
- Deep Learning Nuclei Detection in Digitized Histology Images by Superpixels.Journal of pathology informatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclei detection is often a critical initial step in the development of computer aided diagnosis and prognosis schemes in the context of digital pathology images. While over the last few years, a number of nuclei detection methods have been proposed, most of these approaches make idealistic assumptions about the staining quality of the tissue. In this paper, we present a new Multi-Pass Adaptive Voting (MPAV) for nuclei detection which is specifically geared towards images with poor quality staining and noise on account of tissue preparation artifacts. The MPAV utilizes the symmetric property of nuclear boundary and adaptively selects gradient from edge fragments to perform voting for a potential nucleus location. The MPAV was evaluated in three cohorts with different staining methods: Hematoxylin &Eosin, CD31 &Hematoxylin, and Ki-67 and where most of the nuclei were unevenly and imprecisely stained. Across a total of 47 images and nearly 17,700 manually labeled nuclei serving as the ground truth, MPAV was able to achieve a superior performance, with an area under the precision-recall curve (AUC) of 0.73. Additionally, MPAV also outperformed three state-of-the-art nuclei detection methods, a single pass voting method, a multi-pass voting method, and a deep learning based method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.