Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694926›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2017

NUP98 is rearranged in 3.8% of pediatric AML forming a clinical and molecular homogenous group with a poor prognosis.

S Struski, S Lagarde, P Bories, C Puiseux, N Prade, W Cuccuini, M-P Pages, A Bidet, C Gervais, M Lafage-Pochitaloff and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolutionary Restructuring and Systematic Review of theJournal of developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. RareAmerican journal of cancer research · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

S StruskiDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
S LagardeDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
P BoriesDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
C PuiseuxDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
N PradeDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
W CuccuiniGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
M-P PagesGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
A BidetGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
C GervaisGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
M Lafage-PochitaloffGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
C Roche-LestienneGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
C BarinGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
D PentherGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
N NadalGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
I Radford-WeissGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
M-A Collonge-RameGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
B GaillardGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
F MugneretGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
C LefebvreGroupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH), Paris, France.
E Bart-DelabesseDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
A PetitDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital of Trousseau, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-1622
G LevergerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital of Trousseau, Paris, France.
C BroccardoDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
I LuquetDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
M PasquetDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
E DelabesseDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Toulouse, Centre of Research on Cancer of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France.
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse · FRGroupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRSaint Louis University Hospital · USUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare disease whose prognosis is highly variable according to factors such as chromosomal abnormalities. Recurrent genomic rearrangements are detected in half of pediatric AML by karyotype. NUcleoPorin 98 (NUP98) gene is rearranged with 31 different fusion partner genes. These rearrangements are frequently undetected by conventional cytogenetics, as the NUP98 gene is located at the end of the chromosome 11 short arm (11p15). By screening a series of 574 pediatric AML, we detected a NUP98 rearrangement in 22 cases (3.8%), a frequency similar to CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene (4.0%). The most frequent NUP98 fusion gene partner is NSD1. These cases are homogeneous regarding their biological and clinical characteristics, and associated with bad prognosis only improved by bone marrow transplantation. We detailed the biological characteristics of these AML by exome sequencing which demonstrated few recurrent mutations (FLT3 ITD, WT1, CEBPA, NBPF14, BCR and ODF1). The analysis of the clonal structure in these cases suggests that the mutation order in the NUP98-rearranged pediatric AML begins with the NUP98 rearrangement leading to epigenetic dysregulations then followed by mutations of critical hematopoietic transcription factors and finally, activation of the FLT3 signaling pathway.

Indexed as

Translocation, GeneticAllelesBiomarkers, TumorCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolEpigenesis, GeneticExomeFemalefms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Gene Expression Regulation, LeukemicGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornBiomarkers, TumorCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCEBPA protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3nuclear pore complex protein 98Nuclear Pore Complex ProteinsOncogene Proteins, FusionWT1 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27694926
OpenAlexW2529540084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.