Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694842›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2016

Structural basis of mRNA-cap recognition by Dcp1-Dcp2.

Jeffrey S Mugridge, Marcin Ziemniak, Jacek Jemielity, John D Gross

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trinucleotide mRNA Cap AnalogueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative reconstitution of yeast RNA processing bodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. METTL3 promotes chemoresistance in small cell lung cancer by inducing mitophagy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Eukaryotic mRNA Decapping Activation.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey S MugridgeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Marcin ZiemniakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jacek JemielityCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
John D GrossDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Warsaw · PL

Funding

Structure and Function of the Decapping Enzyme ComplexR01GM078360 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GROSS, JOHN D · 2009 to 2018
$2.5M
Structural basis of mRNA decapping by Dcp2: conformational changes & co-activatorF32GM105313 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MUGRIDGE, JEFFREY SCOTT · 2013 to 2014
$107k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105313NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removal of the 5' cap on mRNA by the decapping enzyme Dcp2 is a critical step in 5'-to-3' mRNA decay. Understanding the structural basis of Dcp2 activity has been a challenge because Dcp2 is dynamic and has weak affinity for the cap substrate. Here we present a 2.6-Å-resolution crystal structure of a heterotrimer of fission yeast Dcp2, its essential activator Dcp1, and the human NMD cofactor PNRC2, in complex with a tight-binding cap analog. Cap binding is accompanied by a conformational change in Dcp2, thereby forming a composite nucleotide-binding site comprising conserved residues in the catalytic and regulatory domains. Kinetic analysis of PNRC2 revealed that a conserved short linear motif enhances both substrate affinity and the catalytic step of decapping. These findings explain why Dcp2 requires a conformational change for efficient catalysis and reveals that coactivators promote RNA binding and the catalytic step of decapping, possibly through different conformational states.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRNA CapsRNA StabilitySchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsDcp1 protein, S pombeDcp2 protein, S pombePNRC2 protein, humanReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRNA CapsSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID27694842
PMCPMC5113729
OpenAlexW2527994978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.