Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694765›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2013

Transcription and Maturation of mRNA in Dinoflagellates.

Sougata Roy, David Morse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RNA-Binding Proteins in Dinoflagellates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Abundant mRNA mEMBO reports · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. From theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Translating the message:Marine and freshwater harmful algae : proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Harmful Algae, 27th-31st October 2014, Wellington, New Zealand. International Conference on Harmful Algae (16th : 2014 : Wellington, N.Z.), author · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sougata RoyInstitut de Recherche en BiologieVégétale, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke east, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada. sougatairbv20@gmail.com.
David MorseInstitut de Recherche en BiologieVégétale, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke east, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada. david.morse@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinoflagellates are of great importance to the marine ecosystem, yet scant details of how gene expression is regulated at the transcriptional level are available. Transcription is of interest in the context of the chromatin structure in the dinoflagellates as it shows many differences from more typical eukaryotic cells. Here we canvas recent transcriptome profiles to identify the molecular building blocks available for the construction of the transcriptional machinery and contrast these with those used by other systems. Dinoflagellates display a clear paucity of specific transcription factors, although surprisingly, the rest of the basic transcriptional machinery is not markedly different from what is found in the close relatives to the dinoflagellates.

Indexed as

gene expressionregulationtranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID27694765
PMCPMC5029490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.