Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694650›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2016

National Health Service Principles as Experienced by Vulnerable London Migrants in "Austerity Britain": A Qualitative Study of Rights, Entitlements, and Civil-Society Advocacy.

Elham Rafighi, Shoba Poduval, Helena Legido-Quigley, Natasha Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Navigating challenges and workarounds: A qualitative study of healthcare and support workers' perceptions on providing care to people seeking sanctuary.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of COVID-19 on migrants' access to primary care and implications for vaccine roll-out: a national qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Austerity or Xenophobia? The Causes and Costs of the "Hostile Environment" in the NHS.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elham RafighiFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Shoba PoduvalFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helena Legido-QuigleyFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Natasha HowardFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged 'health tourism,' could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London.

methodsA qualitative study design was selected. Data were collected through document review and 22 in-depth interviews with non-EEA migrants and civil-society organisation representatives. Data were analysed thematically using the NHS principles.

resultsThe experiences of those 'vulnerable migrants' (ie, defined as adult non-EEA asylum-seekers, refugees, undocumented, low-skilled, and trafficked migrants susceptible to marginalised healthcare access) able to access health services were positive, with healthcare professionals generally demonstrating caring attitudes. However, general confusion existed about entitlements due to recent NHS changes, controversy over 'health tourism,' and challenges registering for health services or accessing secondary facilities. Factors requiring greater clarity or improvement included accessibility, communication, and clarity on general practitioner (GP) responsibilities and migrant entitlements.

conclusionLegislation to restrict access to healthcare based on immigration status could further compromise the health of vulnerable individuals in Britain. This study highlights current challenges in health services policy and practice and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in healthcare advocacy (eg, helping the voices of the most vulnerable reach policy-makers). Thus, it contributes to broadening national discussions and enabling more nuanced interpretation of ongoing global debates on immigration and health.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth PolicyHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHuman RightsRefugeesTransients and MigrantsAdultFemaleFiscal PolicyHealth ExpendituresHumansLondonMaleMedical TourismOrganizationsAusterityEnglandLondonMigrant HealthNational Health Service (NHS)

Identifiers

PMID27694650
PMCPMC5042588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.