Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694621›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Single-molecule FRET studies of the cooperative and non-cooperative binding kinetics of the bacteriophage T4 single-stranded DNA binding protein (gp32) to ssDNA lattices at replication fork junctions.

Wonbae Lee, John P Gillies, Davis Jose, Brett A Israels, Peter H von Hippel, Andrew H Marcus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. DNA replication machinery: Insights fromComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wonbae LeeCenter for Optical, Molecular and Quantum Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
John P GilliesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Davis JoseInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Brett A IsraelsCenter for Optical, Molecular and Quantum Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Peter H von HippelInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA petevh@molbio.uoregon.edu.
Andrew H MarcusCenter for Optical, Molecular and Quantum Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA ahmarcus@uoregon.edu.

Funding

STRUCTURE AND RELATIONS OF PROTEINS AND NUCLEIC ACIDSR01GM015792 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MARCUS, ANDREW HADLEY · 1985 to 2025
$10.2M
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM015792NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene 32 protein (gp32) is the single-stranded (ss) DNA binding protein of the bacteriophage T4. It binds transiently and cooperatively to ssDNA sequences exposed during the DNA replication process and regulates the interactions of the other sub-assemblies of the replication complex during the replication cycle. We here use single-molecule FRET techniques to build on previous thermodynamic studies of gp32 binding to initiate studies of the dynamics of the isolated and cooperative binding of gp32 molecules within the replication complex. DNA primer/template (p/t) constructs are used as models to determine the effects of ssDNA lattice length, gp32 concentration, salt concentration, binding cooperativity and binding polarity at p/t junctions. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and transition density plots (TDPs) are used to characterize the dynamics of the multi-step assembly pathway of gp32 at p/t junctions of differing polarity, and show that isolated gp32 molecules bind to their ssDNA targets weakly and dissociate quickly, while cooperatively bound dimeric or trimeric clusters of gp32 bind much more tightly, can 'slide' on ssDNA sequences, and exhibit binding dynamics that depend on p/t junction polarities. The potential relationships of these binding dynamics to interactions with other components of the T4 DNA replication complex are discussed.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage T4DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedDNA, ViralFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferKineticsProtein BindingSodium ChlorideViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedDNA, Viralgp32 protein, Enterobacteria phage T4Sodium ChlorideViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27694621
PMCPMC5159549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.