Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694526›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2016

Motor unit number estimates and neuromuscular transmission in the tibialis anterior of master athletes: evidence that athletic older people are not spared from age-related motor unit remodeling.

Mathew Piasecki, Alex Ireland, Jessica Coulson, Dan W Stashuk, Andrew Hamilton-Wright, Agnieszka Swiecicka, Martin K Rutter, Jamie S McPhee, David A Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Muscle fibre denervation in ageing.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Neuromuscular Junction: A Shared Vulnerability in Aging and Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathew PiaseckiSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Alex IrelandSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Jessica CoulsonSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Dan W StashukDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew Hamilton-WrightMathematics and Computer Science, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Agnieszka SwiecickaAndrology Research Unit, Cardiovascular, Metabolic and Nutritional Sciences Domain, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Martin K RutterManchester Diabetes Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Jamie S McPheeSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK j.s.mcphee@mmu.ac.uk.
David A JonesSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBMount Allison University · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025252/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle motor unit numbers decrease markedly in old age, while remaining motor units are enlarged and can have reduced neuromuscular junction transmission stability. However, it is possible that regular intense physical activity throughout life can attenuate this remodeling. The aim of this study was to compare the number, size, and neuromuscular junction transmission stability of tibialis anterior (TA) motor units in healthy young and older men with those of exceptionally active master runners. The distribution of motor unit potential (MUP) size was determined from intramuscular electromyographic signals recorded in healthy male Young (mean ± SD, 26 ± 5 years), Old (71 ± 4 years) and Master Athletes (69 ± 3 years). Relative differences between groups in numbers of motor units was assessed using two methods, one comparing MUP size and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) determined with MRI, the other comparing surface recorded MUPs with maximal compound muscle action potentials and commonly known as a "motor unit number estimate (MUNE)". Near fiber (NF) jiggle was measured to assess neuromuscular junction transmission stability. TA CSA did not differ between groups. MUNE values for the Old and Master Athletes were 45% and 40%, respectively, of the Young. Intramuscular MUPs of Old and Master Athletes were 43% and 56% larger than Young. NF jiggle was slightly higher in the Master Athletes, with no difference between Young and Old. These results show substantial and similar motor unit loss and remodeling in Master Athletes and Old individuals compared with Young, which suggests that lifelong training does not attenuate the age-related loss of motor units.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultAgedAgingAthletesElectromyographyExerciseHumansMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeuronal PlasticityRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalRunningSynaptic TransmissionAgingelectromyographymaster athletesmotor unitskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID27694526
PMCPMC5064139
OpenAlexW2524600943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.