Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694210›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

The BEL information extraction workflow (BELIEF): evaluation in the BioCreative V BEL and IAT track.

Sumit Madan, Sven Hodapp, Philipp Senger, Sam Ansari, Justyna Szostak, Julia Hoeng, Manuel Peitsch, Juliane Fluck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Re-curation and rational enrichment of knowledge graphs in Biological Expression Language.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sumit MadanFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany sumit.madan@scai.fraunhofer.de juliane.fluck@scai.fraunhofer.de.
Sven HodappFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Philipp SengerFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Sam AnsariPhilip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland.
Justyna SzostakPhilip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland.
Julia HoengPhilip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland.
Manuel PeitschPhilip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland.
Juliane FluckFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany sumit.madan@scai.fraunhofer.de juliane.fluck@scai.fraunhofer.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network-based approaches have become extremely important in systems biology to achieve a better understanding of biological mechanisms. For network representation, the Biological Expression Language (BEL) is well designed to collate findings from the scientific literature into biological network models. To facilitate encoding and biocuration of such findings in BEL, a BEL Information Extraction Workflow (BELIEF) was developed. BELIEF provides a web-based curation interface, the BELIEF Dashboard, that incorporates text mining techniques to support the biocurator in the generation of BEL networks. The underlying UIMA-based text mining pipeline (BELIEF Pipeline) uses several named entity recognition processes and relationship extraction methods to detect concepts and BEL relationships in literature. The BELIEF Dashboard allows easy curation of the automatically generated BEL statements and their context annotations. Resulting BEL statements and their context annotations can be syntactically and semantically verified to ensure consistency in the BEL network. In summary, the workflow supports experts in different stages of systems biology network building. Based on the BioCreative V BEL track evaluation, we show that the BELIEF Pipeline automatically extracts relationships with an F-score of 36.4% and fully correct statements can be obtained with an F-score of 30.8%. Participation in the BioCreative V Interactive task (IAT) track with BELIEF revealed a systems usability scale (SUS) of 67. Considering the complexity of the task for new users-learning BEL, working with a completely new interface, and performing complex curation-a score so close to the overall SUS average highlights the usability of BELIEF.Database URL: BELIEF is available at http://www.scaiview.com/belief/.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalProgramming LanguagesData Mining

Identifiers

PMID27694210
PMCPMC5045868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.