Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694195›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Combining multiple tools outperforms individual methods in gene set enrichment analyses.

Monther Alhamdoosh, Milica Ng, Nicholas J Wilson, Julie M Sheridan, Huy Huynh, Michael J Wilson, Matthew E Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Doxycycline host-directed therapy in human pulmonary tuberculosis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A practical guide to functional enrichment analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  12. Genomic and Immune Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Associated with Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monther AlhamdooshCSL Limited, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Milica NgCSL Limited, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Nicholas J WilsonCSL Limited, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Julie M SheridanACRF Stem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.
Huy HuynhCSL Limited, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Michael J WilsonCSL Limited, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Matthew E RitchieMolecular Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Gene set enrichment (GSE) analysis allows researchers to efficiently extract biological insight from long lists of differentially expressed genes by interrogating them at a systems level. In recent years, there has been a proliferation of GSE analysis methods and hence it has become increasingly difficult for researchers to select an optimal GSE tool based on their particular dataset. Moreover, the majority of GSE analysis methods do not allow researchers to simultaneously compare gene set level results between multiple experimental conditions. Results: The ensemble of genes set enrichment analyses (EGSEA) is a method developed for RNA-sequencing data that combines results from twelve algorithms and calculates collective gene set scores to improve the biological relevance of the highest ranked gene sets. EGSEA's gene set database contains around 25 000 gene sets from sixteen collections. It has multiple visualization capabilities that allow researchers to view gene sets at various levels of granularity. EGSEA has been tested on simulated data and on a number of human and mouse datasets and, based on biologists' feedback, consistently outperforms the individual tools that have been combined. Our evaluation demonstrates the superiority of the ensemble approach for GSE analysis, and its utility to effectively and efficiently extrapolate biological functions and potential involvement in disease processes from lists of differentially regulated genes. Availability and Implementation: EGSEA is available as an R package at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/EGSEA/ . The gene sets collections are available in the R package EGSEAdata from http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/EGSEAdata/ . Contacts: monther.alhamdoosh@csl.com.au mritchie@wehi.edu.au. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansInterleukin-13Leukocytes, MononuclearMammary Glands, HumanMiceSequence Analysis, RNAIL13 protein, humanInterleukin-13

Identifiers

PMID27694195
PMCPMC5408797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.