Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27694106›Full record

ArticleBiology open2016

Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species.

Matt Sumethasorn, Thomas L Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptional Correlates of Chronic Alcohol Neuroadaptation inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matt SumethasornEcological Biology, 9620 UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-00 m.sumethasorn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-119X
Thomas L TurnerEcological Biology, 9620 UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-00.

Funding

Evolutionary Behavioral Genomics of Drosophila CourtshipR01GM098614 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI TURNER, THOMAS LEE · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work on the model fly Drosophila melanogaster has reported inconsistencies in their preference for laying eggs on intermediate concentrations of ethanol. In this study, we resolve this discrepancy by showing that this species strongly prefers ovipositing on ethanol when it is close to a non-ethanol substrate, but strongly avoids ethanol when options are farther apart. We also show fluidity of these behaviors among other Drosophila species: D. melanogaster is more responsive to ethanol than close relatives in that it prefers ethanol more than other species in the close-proximity case, but avoids ethanol more than other species in the distant case. In the close-proximity scenario, the more ethanol-tolerant species generally prefer ethanol more, with the exception of the island endemic D. santomea This species has the lowest tolerance in the clade, but behaves like D. melanogaster We speculate that this could be an adaptation to protect eggs from parasites or predators such as parasitoid wasps, as larvae migrate to non-toxic substrates after hatching. These natural differences among species are an excellent opportunity to study how genes and brains evolve to alter ethanol preferences, and provide an interesting model for genetic variation in preferences in other organisms, including humans.

Indexed as

BehaviorDecision makingEvolution

Identifiers

PMID27694106
PMCPMC5155530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.