ArticleWater research2016
Differential decomposition of bacterial and viral fecal indicators in common human pollution types.
Article in Water research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cultured and molecular measures of fecal indicator microbes in Gulf of Mexico recreational waters.The Science of the total environment · 2025Article
- Quantitative fecal pollution assessment with bacterial, viral, and molecular methods in small stream tributaries.The Science of the total environment · 2024Article
- Comparing the decay of human wastewater-associated markers and enteric viruses in laboratory microcosms simulating estuarine waters in a temperate climatic zone using qPCR/RT-qPCR assays.The Science of the total environment · 2024Article
- Improved virus concentration methods for wash waters from decontamination of permeable and non-permeable surfaces.Journal of virological methods · 2023Article
- The Effect of Protozoa Indigenous to Lakewater and Wastewater on Decay of Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Coliphage.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of two wastewater disinfection strategies for the removal of fecal indicator bacteria, bacteriophage, and enteric viral pathogens concentrated using dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF).The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- Fecal indicators and antibiotic resistance genes exhibit diurnal trends in the Chattahoochee River: Implications for water quality monitoring.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and associated genetic markers from wastewater treatment plant effluents in freshwater microcosms.Journal of water and health · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters.Journal of virological methods · 2021Article
- Variable fecal source prioritization in recreational waters routinely monitored with viral and bacterial general indicators.Water research · 2021Article
- Decay of SARS-CoV-2 and surrogate murine hepatitis virus RNA in untreated wastewater to inform application in wastewater-based epidemiology.Environmental research · 2020Article
- Decay of infectious adenovirus and coliphages in freshwater habitats is differentially affected by ambient sunlight and the presence of indigenous protozoa communities.Virology journal · 2020Article
- Persistence and Decay of Fecal Microbiota in Aquatic Habitats.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2019Review
- Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment.The Science of the total environment · 2019Article
- Relationships between Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in Recreational Water Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- Incidence of somatic and F+ coliphage in Great Lake Basin recreational waters.Water research · 2018Article
- Frequent detection of a human fecal indicator in the urban ocean: environmental drivers and covariation with enterococci.Environmental science. Processes & impacts · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the decomposition of microorganisms associated with different human fecal pollution types is necessary for proper implementation of many water quality management practices, as well as predicting associated public health risks. Here, the decomposition of select cultivated and molecular indicators of fecal pollution originating from fresh human feces, septage, and primary effluent sewage in a subtropical marine environment was assessed over a six day period with an emphasis on the influence of ambient sunlight and indigenous microbiota. Ambient water mixed with each fecal pollution type was placed in dialysis bags and incubated in situ in a submersible aquatic mesocosm. Genetic and cultivated fecal indicators including fecal indicator bacteria (enterococci, E. coli, and Bacteroidales), coliphage (somatic and F+), Bacteroides fragilis phage (GB-124), and human-associated genetic indicators (HF183/BacR287 and HumM2) were measured in each sample. Simple linear regression assessing treatment trends in each pollution type over time showed significant decay (p ≤ 0.05) in most treatments for feces and sewage (27/28 and 32/40, respectively), compared to septage (6/26). A two-way analysis of variance of log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.