Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27693900›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2016

Pain Assessment, Management, and Control Among Patients 65 Years or Older Receiving Hospice Care in the U.S.

Meagan E Cea, M Cary Reid, Charles Inturrisi, Lisa R Witkin, Holly G Prigerson, Yuhua Bao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hispanics and Hospice: A Systematic Literature Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Safeguarding palliative and serious illness care in America.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meagan E CeaDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
M Cary ReidDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Charles InturrisiDepartment of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Lisa R WitkinWeill Cornell Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Holly G PrigersonDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Yuhua BaoDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: yub2003@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Psychosocial Approaches to Better Understanding & End-Stage Cancer Care (PROTECT)R35CA197730 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Holly Gwen Prigerson · 2015 to 2026
$11.2M
Reid Aging and Pain Research Training ProgramK24AG053462 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI REID, MANNEY CARRINGTON · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197730NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextKnowledge is limited regarding pain assessment and management practices, as well as pain-related outcomes in hospice care.

objectivesTo generate national estimates of pain assessment and management practices and outcomes of pain control among patients 65 years or older receiving hospice care in the U.S. and identify hospice discharge and agency characteristics predicting study outcomes.

methodsThe 2007 National Home Health and Hospice Care Survey was analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated to identify discharge and agency characteristics predicting guideline-concordant pain assessment and management practices and pain control outcomes.

resultsA high percentage of discharges had pain assessment at admission (97%) and before discharge (93%); use of valid pain rating scales was relatively low (69% and 54% for first and last assessments, respectively). Almost 95% of patients received pain medication, but only 42% received nonpharmacologic therapies. About 70% of patients assessed with a valid pain scale saw improvement in the level of pain or remained free of pain from admission to discharge. Non-Hispanic blacks were less likely to have pain assessments, and Hispanics were less likely to receive opioid analgesics or to have pain-free status at discharge, compared with non-Hispanic whites. Patients receiving care from for-profit (vs. nonprofit) agencies were more likely to receive pain assessment with a valid scale before discharge but less likely to experience pain control or improvement.

conclusionGreater use of valid pain assessment scales and nonpharmacologic therapies constitutes areas for improvement in hospice care. Targeted interventions are needed to address disparities in pain care by patient race and/or ethnicity and agency ownership status.

Indexed as

Hospice CarePain ManagementPain MeasurementAgedAged, 80 and overEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospicesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesHospicepain assessmentpain control

Identifiers

PMID27693900
PMCPMC5473027
OpenAlexW2524662911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.