Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27693664›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2016

Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias.

Rebecca B Price, Meredith Wallace, Jennie M Kuckertz, Nader Amir, Simona Graur, Logan Cummings, Paul Popa, Per Carlbring, Yair Bar-Haim

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Gaze-Contingent Music Reward Therapy for Clinically Anxious 7- to 10-Year-Olds: An Open Multiple Baseline Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca B PriceUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States. Electronic address: rebecca.price@stanfordalumni.org.
Meredith WallaceUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States.
Jennie M KuckertzSan Diego State University, United States.
Nader AmirSan Diego State University, United States.
Simona GraurUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States.
Logan CummingsUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States.
Paul PopaUniversity of Pittsburgh, United States.
Per CarlbringStockholm University, Sweden.
Yair Bar-HaimTel Aviv University, Israel.

Funding

Neural Dimensions of Attention Bias Modification for Transdiagnostic AnxietyK23MH100259 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRICE, REBECCA · 2013 to 2017
$788k
Statistical Methods for Developing RDoC-based Multidimensional ProfilesK01MH096944 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WALLACE, MEREDITH JOANNE LOTZ · 2013 to 2016
$470k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH096944NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH100259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-based approaches, such as Attention Bias Modification (ABM), could help improve access to care for anxiety. Study-level meta-analyses of ABM have produced conflicting findings and leave critical questions unresolved regarding ABM's mechanisms of action and clinical potential. We pooled patient-level datasets from randomized controlled trials of children and adults with high-anxiety. Attentional bias (AB) towards threat, the target mechanism of ABM, was tested as an outcome and a mechanistic mediator and moderator of anxiety reduction. Diagnostic remission and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) were clinical outcomes available in enough studies to enable pooling. Per-patient data were obtained on at least one outcome from 13/16 eligible studies [86% of eligible participants; n=778]. Significant main effects of ABM on diagnostic remission (ABM-22.6%, control-10.8%; OR=2.57; p=0.006) and AB (β* (95%CI)=-0.63 (-0.83, -0.42); p<0.00005) were observed. There was no main effect of ABM on LSAS. However, moderator analyses suggested ABM was effective for patients who were younger (≤37y), trained in the lab, and/or assessed by clinicians. Under the same conditions where ABM was effective, mechanistic links between AB and anxiety reduction were supported. Under these specific circumstances, ABM reduces anxiety and acts through its target mechanism, supporting ABM's theoretical basis while simultaneously suggesting clinical indications and refinements to improve its currently limited clinical potential.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAdultAnxietyBehavior TherapyChildHumansTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAnxietyAttentional biasAttention Bias ModificationAttention trainingPatient-level meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27693664
PMCPMC5118070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.