ReviewGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2016
Towards Personalized Intervention for Alzheimer's Disease.
Review in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum for the treatment of Alzheimer disease: A pilot study.Medicine · 2018Trial
- Peptide-based therapeutics in the management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their potential to develop novel strategies.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- Retinal Microstructural and Microvascular Changes in Alzheimer Disease: A Review.International ophthalmology clinics · 2025Review
- Exploring Algorithmic Explainability: Generating Explainable AI Insights for Personalized Clinical Decision Support Focused on Cannabis Intoxication in Young Adults.2024 International Conference on Activity and Behavior Computing · 2024Article
- The Immunopathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease Is Related to the Composition of Gut Microbiota.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Personalizing the Care and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Review
- The "rights" of precision drug development for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2019Review
- Modifiable Risk Factors Discriminate Memory Trajectories in Non-Demented Aging: Precision Factors and Targets for Promoting Healthier Brain Aging and Preventing Dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Article
- Peptides as Potential Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Article
- Decreased Tissue COX5B Expression and Mitochondrial Dysfunction during Sepsis-Induced Kidney Injury in Rats.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains to be a grand challenge for the international community despite over a century of exploration. A key factor likely accounting for such a situation is the vast heterogeneity in the disease etiology, which involves very complex and divergent pathways. Therefore, intervention strategies shall be tailored for subgroups of AD patients. Both demographic and in-depth information is needed for patient stratification. The demographic information includes primarily APOE genotype, age, gender, education, environmental exposure, life style, and medical history, whereas in-depth information stems from genome sequencing, brain imaging, peripheral biomarkers, and even functional assays on neurons derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent cells (iPSCs). Comprehensive information collection, better understanding of the disease mechanisms, and diversified strategies of drug development would help with more effective intervention in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.