Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27693139›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Imbalanced Activity in the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Nucleus Accumbens Impairs Behavioral Inhibition.

Heidi C Meyer, David J Bucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medial orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens mediation in risk assessment behaviors in adolescents and adults.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The effects of early life stress on impulsivity.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  16. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi C MeyerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
David J BucciDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: david.j.bucci@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Inhibitory BehaviorR01DA027688 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BUCCI, DAVID J · 2010 to 2013
$917k
Mechanisms Underlying the Development of Inhibitory BehaviorF31MH107138 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MEYER, HEIDI CATHERINE · 2015 to 2015
$43k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027688NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH107138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary models of behavioral regulation maintain that balanced activity between cognitive control areas (prefrontal cortex, PFC) and subcortical reward-related regions (nucleus accumbens, NAC) mediates the selection of appropriate behavioral responses, whereas imbalanced activity (PFC < NAC) results in maladaptive behavior [1-6]. Imbalance can arise from reduced engagement of PFC (via fatigue or stress [7]) or from excessive activity in NAC [8]. Additionally, a concept far less researched is that an imbalance can result from simultaneously low PFC activity and high NAC activity. This occurs during adolescence, when the maturation of PFC lags behind that of NAC and NAC is more functionally active compared to adulthood or pre-adolescence [2, 5, 9, 10]. Accordingly, activity is disproportionately higher in NAC than in PFC, which may contribute to impulsivity and risk-taking exhibited by adolescents [5, 6, 10-12]. Despite having explanatory value, support for this notion has been solely correlational. Here, we causally tested this using chemogenetics to simultaneously decrease neural activity in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and increase activity in NAC in adult rats, mimicking the imbalance during adolescence. We tested the effects on negative occasion setting, an important yet understudied form of inhibitory learning that may be particularly relevant during adolescence. Rats with combined manipulation of OFC and NAC were impaired in learning to use environmental cues to withhold a response, an effect that was greater than that of either manipulation alone. These findings provide direct evidence that simultaneous underactivity in OFC and overactivity in NAC can negatively impact behavioral control and provide insight into the neural systems that underlie inhibitory learning.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalLearningAnimalsImpulsive BehaviorMaleNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansRisk-Takingadolescenceassociative learningchemogeneticsconditioningDREADDslearningnegative occasion settingprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID27693139
PMCPMC5117684
OpenAlexW2526933263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.