Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27692617›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017

Impact of associative word learning on phonotactic processing in 6-month-old infants: A combined EEG and fNIRS study.

Hellmuth Obrig, Julia Mock, Franziska Stephan, Maria Richter, Micol Vignotto, Sonja Rossi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural signatures of word learning during adult-child interactions.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hellmuth ObrigClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: obrig@cbs.mpg.de.
Julia MockClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Franziska StephanClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Maria RichterClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Germany.
Micol VignottoClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Sonja RossiClinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Department for Medical Psychology & Department for Speech, Hearing, and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DELeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During early language development native phonotactics are acquired in a 'bottom-up' fashion, relying on exquisite auditory differentiation skills operational from birth. Since basic lexico-semantic abilities have been demonstrated from 6 months onwards, 'top-down' influences on phonotactic learning may complement the extraction of transitional probabilities in phonotactic learning. Such a bidirectional acquisition strategy predicts, that familiarization with (proto)words should affect processing of untrained word-forms of similar phonological structure. We investigated 6-month-old infants undergoing an associative training to establish a pseudoword-pseudoobject link. Comparison between pre- and post-training responses to trained and untrained items allowed investigating training effects. Additionally phonotactic status (50% legal, 50% illegal with regard to German) allowed investigating influences of previous language experience. EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) provided measures of electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses. We find evidence for a robust effect of associative training on pseudoword processing when presented in isolation. This transferred to untrained items. Previous linguistic experience showed a much weaker effect. Taken together the results suggest that sensitivity to phonotactic contrasts is present at 6 months, but that acceptance as lexical candidates is rapidly modulated when word forms following non-native phonotactics become potentially meaningful due to repeated exposure in a semantic context.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentPhoneticsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantLearningMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAssociative trainingfNIRSLanguage developmentPhonotactics

Identifiers

PMID27692617
PMCPMC6987754
OpenAlexW2521658053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.