Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27692185›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2016

The Alcohol Intervention Mechanisms Scale (AIMS): Preliminary Reliability and Validity of a Common Factor Observational Rating Measure.

M Magill, Timothy R Apodaca, Justin Walthers, Jacques Gaume, Ayla Durst, Richard Longabaugh, Robert L Stout, Kathleen M Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014-2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M MagillCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: molly_magill@brown.edu.
Timothy R ApodacaChildren's Mercy Kansas City, USA; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, USA.
Justin WalthersCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jacques GaumeCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ayla DurstCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Richard LongabaughCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Robert L StoutCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Providence, RI, USA.
Kathleen M CarrollYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Brown University · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USProvidence College · USYale University · US

Funding

Within- and Post-Session Change Mechanisms in Treatment for Alcohol Use DisordersK23AA018126 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2010 to 2014
$684k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA018126NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA017783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work provides an overview, and pilot reliability and validity for the Alcohol Intervention Mechanisms Scale (AIMS). The AIMS measures therapist interventions that occur broadly across modalities of behavioral treatment for alcohol use disorder. It was developed based on identified commonalities in the function rather than content of therapist interventions in observed therapy sessions, as well as from existing observer rating systems. In the AIMS, the primary function areas are: explore (four behavior count codes), teach (five behavior count codes), and connect (three behavior count codes). Therapist behavior counts provide a frequency rating of occurrence (i.e., adherence). The three functions (explore, teach, connect) are then rated on global skillfulness, which provides a quality valence (i.e., competence) to the entire session. In the present study, three independent raters received roughly 30 hours of training on the use of the AIMS by the first author. Data were a sample of therapy session audio files from a Project MATCH clinical research site. Reliability results showed generally good performance for the measure. Specifically, 2-way mixed intraclass coefficients were 'excellent', ranging from .94 to .99 for function summary scores, while prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa for global skillfulness measures were in the 'fair' to 'moderate' range (k=.36 to.40). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable, as were preliminary factor models by behavioral treatment function (i.e., explore, teach, connect). However, confirmatory fit for the subsequent three factor model was poor. In concurrent validity analyses, AIMS summary and skillfulness scores showed associations with relevant Project MATCH criterion measures (i.e., MATCH Tape Rating Scale) that were consistent with expectations. The AIMS is a promising and reliable observational measure of three proposed common functions of behavioral alcohol treatment.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicProcess Assessment, Health CareAlcohol-Related DisordersBehavior TherapyHumansPilot ProjectsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAlcoholCommon factorsProcess researchProject MATCHPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID27692185
PMCPMC5079285
OpenAlexW2476161045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.