Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27690745›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2017

Within-session and one-week practice effects on a motor task in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Sydney Y Schaefer, Kevin Duff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Post-stroke cognitive impairments and responsiveness to motor rehabilitation: A review.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sydney Y Schaefera School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering , Arizona State University , Tempe , AZ , USA.
Kevin Duffb Center on Aging , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Cognitive training and practice effects in MCIR01AG045163 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DUFF, KEVIN M · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Generalization of functional task-specific motor training in older adultsK01AG047926 · NIA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHAEFER, SYDNEY YOSHIE · 2015 to 2018
$543k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG047926NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practice effects on neuropsychological tests, which are improvements in test scores due to repeated exposure to testing materials, are robust in healthy elders, but muted in older adults with cognitive disorders. Conversely, few studies have investigated practice effects on motor tasks involving procedural memory, particularly across test-retest periods exceeding 24 hours. The current study examined one-week practice effects on a novel upper extremity motor task in 54 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Results indicate that these individuals with primary memory deficits did improve on this motor task within a brief training session as well as across one week. These practice effects were unrelated to demographic characteristics or global cognition. One-week practice effects were, however, negatively related to delayed memory function, with larger practice effects being associated with poorer delayed memory and potentially better visuospatial ability. The presence of longer term practice effects on a procedural motor task not only has implications for how longitudinal assessments with similar measures involving implicit memory might be interpreted, but may also inform future rehabilitative strategies for patients with more severe declarative memory deficits.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAmnesiaCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceAgingMild cognitive impairmentMotor learningPractice effectsProcedural memory.

Identifiers

PMID27690745
PMCPMC5453647
OpenAlexW2529301809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.