Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27690199›Full record

ArticleToxicology mechanisms and methods2016

Electronic cigarette aerosol induces significantly less cytotoxicity than tobacco smoke.

David Azzopardi, Kharishma Patel, Tomasz Jaunky, Simone Santopietro, Oscar M Camacho, John McAughey, Marianna Gaça

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology mechanisms and methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary effects of e-liquid flavors: a systematic review.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David Azzopardia British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
Kharishma Patela British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
Tomasz Jaunkya British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
Simone Santopietroa British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
Oscar M Camachoa British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
John McAugheya British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
Marianna Gaçaa British American Tobacco, R&D Centre , Southampton , Hampshire , UK.
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GBBritish American Tobacco (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes) are a potential means of addressing the harm to public health caused by tobacco smoking by offering smokers a less harmful means of receiving nicotine. As e-cigarettes are a relatively new phenomenon, there are limited scientific data on the longer-term health effects of their use. This study describes a robust in vitro method for assessing the cytotoxic response of e-cigarette aerosols that can be effectively compared with conventional cigarette smoke. This was measured using the regulatory accepted Neutral Red Uptake assay modified for air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures. An exposure system, comprising a smoking machine, traditionally used for in vitro tobacco smoke exposure assessments, was adapted for use with e-cigarettes to expose human lung epithelial cells at the ALI. Dosimetric analysis methods using real-time quartz crystal microbalances for mass, and post-exposure chemical analysis for nicotine, were employed to detect/distinguish aerosol dilutions from a reference Kentucky 3R4F cigarette and two commercially available e-cigarettes (Vype eStick and ePen). ePen aerosol induced 97%, 94% and 70% less cytotoxicity than 3R4F cigarette smoke based on matched EC

Indexed as

AerosolsBronchiCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCell SurvivalEpithelial CellsHumansNicotianaNicotineSmokeToxicity TestsAerosolsNicotineSmokeAir–liquid interfacee-cigaretteslung epithelial cellstobacco smoke

Identifiers

PMID27690199
PMCPMC5309870
OpenAlexW2525538190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.