ReviewGenes2016
Modeling Fragile X Syndrome Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Review in Genes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic strategies for fragile X syndrome and implications for other gene-silencing disorders.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Transcriptional Dysregulation and Impaired Neuronal Activity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- iPSCs: A Preclinical Drug Research Tool for Neurological Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Heterogeneity in Fragile X Syndrome Highlights the Need for Precision Medicine-Based Treatments.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Great Expectations: Induced pluripotent stem cell technologies in neurodevelopmental impairments.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Review
- iPSC modeling of rare pediatric disorders.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Review
- The Contribution of Pluripotent Stem Cell (PSC)-Based Models to the Study of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS).Brain sciences · 2019Review
- Human stem cell modeling in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).Experimental neurology · 2018Review
- Reevaluation ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Review
- Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Gene Expression and the Intricate Life of Eukaryotic mRNAs.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common heritable form of cognitive impairment. It results from a loss-of-function mutation by a CGG repeat expansion at the 5' untranslated region of the X-linked
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.