Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27689717›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2016

Phase i trials in melanoma: A framework to translate preclinical findings to the clinic.

Eunjung Kim, Vito W Rebecca, Keiran S M Smalley, Alexander R A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AnSmall methods · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational models of melanoma.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eunjung KimIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: Eunjung.Kim@moffitt.org.
Vito W RebeccaThe Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Keiran S M SmalleyThe Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Alexander R A AndersonIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
"Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research", as part of Moffitt PS-OC, "Cancer as a Complex adaptive System"U54CA193489 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN, GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2015 to 2020
$12.5M
The Physi(ologi)cal Microenvironment and its Role in Tumor Invasion and MetastaseU54CA143970 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2009 to 2014
$9.3M
Predicting Prostate Cancer AggressivenessU01CA151924 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN, AYALA, GUSTAVO ENRIQUE · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Microenvironment mediated drug resistance in melanoma.R01CA161107 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SMALLEY, KEIRAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Crowdsourcing optimal cancer treatment strategies that maximize efficacy and minimize toxicityUH2CA203781 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN · 2016 to 2017
$556k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161107NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151924NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143970NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193489NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA203781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of major issues in clinical trials in oncology is their high failure rate, despite the fact that the trials were designed based on the data from successful equivalent preclinical studies. This is in part due to the intrinsic homogeneity of preclinical model systems and the contrasting heterogeneity of actual patient responses.

methodsWe present a mathematical model-driven framework, phase i (virtual/imaginary) trials, that integrates the heterogeneity of actual patient responses and preclinical studies through a cohort of virtual patients. The framework includes an experimentally calibrated mathematical model, a cohort of heterogeneous virtual patients, an assessment of stratification factors, and treatment optimisation. We show the detailed process through the lens of melanoma combination therapy (chemotherapy and an AKT inhibitor), using both preclinical and clinical data.

resultsThe mathematical model predicts melanoma treatment response and resistance to mono and combination therapies and was calibrated and then validated with in vitro experimental data. The validated model and a genetic algorithm were used to generate virtual patients whose tumour volume responses to the combination therapy matched statistically the actual heterogeneous patient responses in the clinical trial. Analyses on simulated cohorts revealed key model parameters such as a tumour volume doubling rate and a therapy-induced phenotypic switch rate that may have clinical correlates. Finally, our approach predicts optimal AKT inhibitor scheduling suggesting more effective but less toxic treatment strategies.

conclusionOur proposed computational framework to implement phase i trials in cancer can readily capture observed heterogeneous clinical outcomes and predict patient survival. Importantly, phase i trials can be used to optimise future clinical trial design.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalUser-Computer InterfaceAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationDrug Therapy, CombinationHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMelanomaProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingMK 2206Protein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktClinical trialsHeterogeneity of patient responsesMathematical modelStratificationTreatment schedule optimisation

Identifiers

PMID27689717
PMCPMC5658204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.