ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2016
Phase i trials in melanoma: A framework to translate preclinical findings to the clinic.
Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic control methods for n-of-1 and parallel-group trials in Alzheimer's disease: A proof-of-concept study using the I-CONECT.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- In silico clinical trials of BiTE expression by oncolytic viruses reveal the impact of patient heterogeneity on dosage protocol.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A virtual cohort framework with applications to adoptive cell therapy in bladder cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Virtual Clinical Trials of BMP4 Differentiation Therapy: Digital Twins to Aid Successful Glioblastoma Trial Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mathematical modeling framework enhances clinical trial design for maintenance treatment in oncology.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mathematical Model-Driven Deep Learning Enables Personalized Adaptive Therapy.Cancer research · 2024Article
- Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023Review
- A survey of open questions in adaptive therapy: Bridging mathematics and clinical translation.eLife · 2023Article
- A practical guide for the generation of model-based virtual clinical trials.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- Spatial structure impacts adaptive therapy by shaping intra-tumoral competition.Communications medicine · 2022Article
- AnSmall methods · 2021Article
- A mathematical model for the quantification of a patient's sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors and long-term tumour burden.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Adaptive Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: Predictions from Patient Calibrated Mathematical Models.Cancers · 2021Article
- Mathematical model predicts response to chemotherapy in advanced non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based doublet.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Computational models of melanoma.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2020Review
- Virtual clinical trials identify effective combination therapies in ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- System-based approaches as prognostic tools for glioblastoma.BMC cancer · 2019Review
- The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.Physical biology · 2019Review
- New insights into RAS biology reinvigorate interest in mathematical modeling of RAS signaling.Seminars in cancer biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of major issues in clinical trials in oncology is their high failure rate, despite the fact that the trials were designed based on the data from successful equivalent preclinical studies. This is in part due to the intrinsic homogeneity of preclinical model systems and the contrasting heterogeneity of actual patient responses.
methodsWe present a mathematical model-driven framework, phase i (virtual/imaginary) trials, that integrates the heterogeneity of actual patient responses and preclinical studies through a cohort of virtual patients. The framework includes an experimentally calibrated mathematical model, a cohort of heterogeneous virtual patients, an assessment of stratification factors, and treatment optimisation. We show the detailed process through the lens of melanoma combination therapy (chemotherapy and an AKT inhibitor), using both preclinical and clinical data.
resultsThe mathematical model predicts melanoma treatment response and resistance to mono and combination therapies and was calibrated and then validated with in vitro experimental data. The validated model and a genetic algorithm were used to generate virtual patients whose tumour volume responses to the combination therapy matched statistically the actual heterogeneous patient responses in the clinical trial. Analyses on simulated cohorts revealed key model parameters such as a tumour volume doubling rate and a therapy-induced phenotypic switch rate that may have clinical correlates. Finally, our approach predicts optimal AKT inhibitor scheduling suggesting more effective but less toxic treatment strategies.
conclusionOur proposed computational framework to implement phase i trials in cancer can readily capture observed heterogeneous clinical outcomes and predict patient survival. Importantly, phase i trials can be used to optimise future clinical trial design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.