Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27689427›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2016

Development and Validation of the EXPECT Questionnaire: Assessing Patient Expectations of Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments for Chronic Pain.

Salene M W Jones, Jane Lange, Judith Turner, Dan Cherkin, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Clarissa Hsu, Heidi Berthoud, Karen Sherman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06922188 (Development of Measures to Screen for Financial Hardship in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06922188 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of Measures to Screen for Financial Hardship in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia

TypeobservationalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled2,460ConditionsFinancial Hardship, Alzheimer&#39, s Disease (AD), Alzheimer&#39
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Salene M W Jones1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, WA.
Jane Lange2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle, WA.
Judith Turner3 University of Washington , Seattle, WA.
Dan Cherkin1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, WA.
Cheryl Ritenbaugh4 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ.
Clarissa Hsu1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, WA.
Heidi Berthoud1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, WA.
Karen Sherman1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, WA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Measuring Patient Expectations for CAM TherapiesR01AT005809 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI SHERMAN, KAREN J · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient expectations may be associated with outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments for chronic pain. However, a psychometrically sound measure of such expectations is needed.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a questionnaire to assess individuals' expectations regarding outcomes of CAM treatments for chronic low back pain (CLBP), as well as a short form of the questionnaire.

methodsAn 18-item draft questionnaire was developed through literature review, cognitive interviews with individuals with CLBP, CAM practitioners, and expert consultation. Two samples completed the questionnaire: (1) a community sample (n = 141) completed it via an online survey before or soon after starting a CAM treatment for CLBP, and (2) participants (n = 181) in randomized clinical trials evaluating CAM treatments for CLBP or fibromyalgia completed it prior to or shortly after starting treatment. Factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity were examined.

resultsBased on factor analyses, 10 items reflecting expectations (used to create a total score) and three items reflecting hopes (not scored) were selected for the questionnaire. The questionnaire had high internal consistency, moderate test-retest reliability, and moderate correlations with other measures of expectations. A three-item short form also had adequate reliability and validity.

conclusionsThe Expectations for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments (EXPECT) questionnaire can be used in research to assess individuals' expectations of treatments for chronic pain. It is recommended that the three hope questions are included (but not scored) to help respondents distinguish between hopes and expectations. The short form may be appropriate for clinical settings and when expectation measurement is not a primary focus.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesAdultAgedBack PainChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYogaYoung Adultacupunctureback painchiropracticcomplementary and alternative medicinemassageyoga

Identifiers

PMID27689427
PMCPMC5116692
OpenAlexW2529149716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.