ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2016
Antibody-supervised deep learning for quantification of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in hematoxylin and eosin stained breast cancer samples.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Collagen Architecture and Composition Improve Risk Stratification in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-driven recognition of panoramic tumor microenvironment features in H&E sections and its application.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Quality Assurance: Transforming Diagnostics, Surgery, and Patient Care-Innovations, Limitations, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Inflammation in cancer: therapeutic opportunities from new insights.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Enhancing AI Research for Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Datasets.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Review
- Deciphering cell to cell spatial relationship for pathology images using SpatialQPFs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A deep-learning framework to predict cancer treatment response from histopathology images through imputed transcriptomics.Nature cancer · 2024Article
- Application of Machine Learning in Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- A Multi-Stain Breast Cancer Histological Whole-Slide-Image Data Set from Routine Diagnostics.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2023Review
- Biological insights and novel biomarker discovery through deep learning approaches in breast cancer histopathology.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Review
- Deep Learning Based Methods for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Future Direction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Predicting IHC staining classes of NF1 using features in the hematoxylin channel.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approaches in Histopathology.Cancers · 2022Review
- Fast whole-slide cartography in colon cancer histology using superpixels and CNN classification.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Analysis of the Adipose Tissue and the Prediction of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted compositional analyses of human abdominal aortic aneurysmsFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Outcome and Biomarker Supervised Deep Learning for Survival Prediction in Two Multicenter Breast Cancer Series.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.Artificial intelligence review · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune cell infiltration in tumor is an emerging prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. The gold standard for quantification of immune cells in tissue sections is visual assessment through a microscope, which is subjective and semi-quantitative. In this study, we propose and evaluate an approach based on antibody-guided annotation and deep learning to quantify immune cell-rich areas in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained samples.
methodsConsecutive sections of formalin-fixed parafin-embedded samples obtained from the primary tumor of twenty breast cancer patients were cut and stained with H&E and the pan-leukocyte CD45 antibody. The stained slides were digitally scanned, and a training set of immune cell-rich and cell-poor tissue regions was annotated in H&E whole-slide images using the CD45-expression as a guide. In analysis, the images were divided into small homogenous regions, superpixels, from which features were extracted using a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) and classified with a support of vector machine. The CNN approach was compared to texture-based classification and to visual assessments performed by two pathologists.
resultsIn a set of 123,442 labeled superpixels, the CNN approach achieved an F-score of 0.94 (range: 0.92-0.94) in discrimination of immune cell-rich and cell-poor regions, as compared to an F-score of 0.88 (range: 0.87-0.89) obtained with the texture-based classification. When compared to visual assessment of 200 images, an agreement of 90% (κ = 0.79) to quantify immune infiltration with the CNN approach was achieved while the inter-observer agreement between pathologists was 90% (κ = 0.78).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that deep learning can be applied to quantify immune cell infiltration in breast cancer samples using a basic morphology staining only. A good discrimination of immune cell-rich areas was achieved, well in concordance with both leukocyte antigen expression and pathologists' visual assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.