Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688881›Full record

ArticleJournal of therapeutic ultrasound2016

MR thermometry for focused ultrasound monitoring utilizing model predictive filtering and ultrasound beam modeling.

Henrik Odéen, Scott Almquist, Joshua de Bever, Douglas A Christensen, Dennis L Parker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of therapeutic ultrasound, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrik OdéenUtah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Scott AlmquistSchool of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Joshua de BeverUtah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Douglas A ChristensenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Dennis L ParkerUtah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Non-Invasive Image-Guided HIFU for Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA134599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L, ROEMER, ROBERT · 2008 to 2011
$2.4M
Improved MRI temperature imaging using a subject-specific biophysical modelR01EB013433 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134599NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB013433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major challenge in using magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) to monitor focused ultrasound (FUS) applications is achieving high spatio-temporal resolution over a large field of view (FOV). This is important to accurately monitor all ultrasound (US) power depositions. Magnetic resonance (MR) subsampling in conjunction with thermal model-based reconstruction of the MRTI utilizing Pennes bioheat transfer equation (PBTE) is one promising approach. The thermal properties used in the thermal model are often estimated from a pre-treatment, low-power sonication.

methodsIn this proof-of-concept study we investigate the use of US simulations computed using the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method to estimate the US power deposition density Q, thereby avoiding the pre-treatment sonication and any potential tissue damage. MRTI reconstructions are performed using a thermal model-based reconstruction method called model predictive filtering (MPF). Experiments are performed in a homogeneous gelatin phantom and in a gelatin phantom with embedded plastic skull. MPF reconstructions are compared to separate sonications imaged with fully sampled data over a smaller FOV. Temperature root-mean-square errors (RMSE) and focal spot positions and shapes are evaluated.

resultsHAS simulations accurately predict the location of the focal spot (to within 1 mm) in both phantoms. Accurate temperature maps (RMSE below 1 °C), where the location of the focal spot agrees well with fully sampled "truth" (to within 1 mm), are also achieved in both phantoms.

conclusionsHAS simulations can be used to accurately predict the focal spot location in homogeneous media and when focusing through an aberrating plastic skull. The HAS simulated power deposition (Q) patterns can be used in the MPF thermal model-based reconstruction to obtain accurate temperature maps with high spatio-temporal resolution over large FOVs.

Indexed as

Hybrid angular spectrumModel predictive filteringMR thermometryProton-resonance frequency shiftUltrasound modeling

Identifiers

PMID27688881
PMCPMC5032243
OpenAlexW2520036845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.