Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688862›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2016

Association between Socioeconomic Status and Cancer Screening in Koreans over 40 Years in Age Based on the 2010-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Jin-Young Kim, Hee-Taik Kang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Occupational Class and Cancer Survival in Korean Men: Follow-Up Study of Nation-Wide Working Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin-Young KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.
Hee-Taik KangDepartment of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.; Department of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
Chungbuk National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and cancer screening in a Korean population aged 40 years or older.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 12,303 participants (5,284 men and 7,019 women) who participated in the 2010-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Self-reported questionnaires were used to assess participant's SES (household income, occupational, and educational status) and cancer screening behavior.

resultsCompared to the lowest household income group, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for overall cancer screening of the highest income group were 2.113 (1.606-2.781) in men and 1.476 (1.157-1.883) in women; those for private cancer screening of the highest income group were 2.446 (1.800-3.324) in men and 2.630 (2.050-3.373) in women, while those for National Cancer Screening Programs (NCSP) in the highest income group were 1.076 (0.805-1.439) in men and 0.492 (0.388-0.623) in women. Compared to manual workers, ORs (95% CIs) for private cancer screening of office workers were 1.300 (1.018-1.660) in men and 0.822 (0.616-1.098) in women. In comparison to the least educated men, OR (95% CI) for private cancer screening of the most educated men was statistically significant (1.530 [1.117-2.095]).

conclusionHigher economic status was associated with higher rates of overall and private cancer screening in both sexes and a lower rate of NCSP in women. Male office workers and more educated individuals underwent private cancer screening at a higher rate than manual workers and less educated individuals, respectively.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerEducationIncomeOccupationsSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID27688862
PMCPMC5039120
OpenAlexW2525130434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.