Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688652›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

How significant is the association between metabolic syndrome and prevalence of colorectal neoplasia?

Stepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Ondrej Ngo, Gabriela Vojtechova, Ondrej Majek, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Bohumil Seifert, Ladislav Dusek and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stepan SuchanekStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas GregaStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej NgoStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Gabriela VojtechovaStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej MajekStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra MinarikovaStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Nagyija BrogyukStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Bohus BunganicStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Bohumil SeifertStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ladislav DusekStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav ZavoralStepan Suchanek, Tomas Grega, Gabriela Vojtechova, Petra Minarikova, Nagyija Brogyuk, Bohus Bunganic, Miroslav Zavoral, Department of Internal Medicine, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, CZ 169 02 Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles Sturt University · AUUniversity of Charleston · USCharles University · CZMasaryk University · CZMilitary University Hospital Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence and prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and colorectal cancer (CRC) has been rising in developed countries. The association between these two diseases has been widely studied and reported. Less evidence is available about the relationship between MS and CRC precancerous lesions (adenomatous polyps, adenomas). The aim of this paper is to present an overview of our scientific understanding of that topic and its implication in clinical practice. One of the principal goals of current CRC secondary prevention efforts is to detect and remove the precancerous lesions in individuals with an average CRC risk to prevent the development of invasive cancer. MS is not currently considered a high-risk CRC factor and is therefore not included in the guidelines of organized screening programs. However, in light of growing scientific evidence, the approach to patients with MS should be changed. Metabolic risk factors for the development of adenomas and cancers are the same - obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus type 2. Therefore, the key issue in the near future is the development of a simple scoring system, easy to use in clinical practice, which would identify individuals with high metabolic risk of colorectal neoplasia and would be used for individual CRC secondary prevention strategies. Currently, such scoring systems have been published based on Asian (Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening Score; APCS) and Polish populations.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCzech RepublicGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMass ScreeningMetabolic SyndromeMyocardial IschemiaNeoplasm InvasivenessObesityPrevalenceRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionSeverity of Illness IndexColorectal neoplasiaDiabetes mellitus type 2Heart ischemic diseaseMetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27688652
PMCPMC5037079
OpenAlexW2523435366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.