ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2016
Systematic review of statins in sepsis: There is no evidence of dose response.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Statin Use on Sepsis Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of statin therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Dose-Dependent Efficacy of Ulinastatin in Improving 28-Day and 30-Day Survival Rates in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Chasing the Ghost: Hyperinflammation Does Not Cause Sepsis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Effect of Statin Use on the Clinical Manifestations, Laboratory Test Results and Outcome of Lyme Neuroborreliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Impact of prior statin use on mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and bloodstream infection.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Observational
- Impact of pre-existing treatment with statins on the course and outcome of tick-borne encephalitis.PloS one · 2018Observational
- Article
- Local application of statins in the treatment of experimental periodontal disease in rats.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOBArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSepsis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with significant costs to the healthcare organizations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether high or low-dose statin therapy improved mortality in patients with sepsis.
methodsThe trials analyzed in this study were multicenter or single center randomized control studies using statins for sepsis in a hospital setting. The patients included were adults with suspected or confirmed infection.
interventionsThis study found eight randomized controlled trials where participants were given either a statin or placebo daily for 14-28 days, the duration of their illness, or until their death or discharge, which ever occurred first. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURED: This meta-analysis measured the effect of statin therapy on in hospital and 28 days mortality.
resultsIn unselected patients, there was no demonstrable difference in the 28 days mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.88 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12 and P = 0.16). There was also no significant difference between statin versus placebo for in-hospital mortality (RR 0.98 95% CI, 0.85-1.14 P = 0.36). When the studies where divided into low-dose and high-dose groups, there were no statistically significant differences for in-hospital mortality between low-dose statin versus placebo for (RR 0.81 CI 0.44-1.49 P = 0.27) or high-dose statin versus placebo (RR 0.99 95% CI 0.85-1.16, P = 0.28). There was no significant difference in adverse effects between the high- and low-dose groups.
conclusionsIn this meta-analysis, we found that the use of statins did not significantly improve either in-hospital mortality or 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. In the low-dose group, there were fewer quality multicenter studies; hence, conclusions based on the results of this subgroup are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.