Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688630›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2016

Systematic review of statins in sepsis: There is no evidence of dose response.

Morgan Quinn, Claire Moody, Bill Tunnicliffe, Zahid Khan, Mav Manji, Sandeep Gudibande, Nick Murphy, Tony Whitehouse, Catherine Snelson, Tonny Veenith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Morgan QuinnDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Claire MoodyDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Bill TunnicliffeDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Zahid KhanDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Mav ManjiDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Sandeep GudibandeDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Nick MurphyDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Tony WhitehouseDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Catherine SnelsonDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Tonny VeenithDepartment of Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK; Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK; School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSepsis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with significant costs to the healthcare organizations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether high or low-dose statin therapy improved mortality in patients with sepsis.

methodsThe trials analyzed in this study were multicenter or single center randomized control studies using statins for sepsis in a hospital setting. The patients included were adults with suspected or confirmed infection.

interventionsThis study found eight randomized controlled trials where participants were given either a statin or placebo daily for 14-28 days, the duration of their illness, or until their death or discharge, which ever occurred first. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURED: This meta-analysis measured the effect of statin therapy on in hospital and 28 days mortality.

resultsIn unselected patients, there was no demonstrable difference in the 28 days mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.88 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12 and P = 0.16). There was also no significant difference between statin versus placebo for in-hospital mortality (RR 0.98 95% CI, 0.85-1.14 P = 0.36). When the studies where divided into low-dose and high-dose groups, there were no statistically significant differences for in-hospital mortality between low-dose statin versus placebo for (RR 0.81 CI 0.44-1.49 P = 0.27) or high-dose statin versus placebo (RR 0.99 95% CI 0.85-1.16, P = 0.28). There was no significant difference in adverse effects between the high- and low-dose groups.

conclusionsIn this meta-analysis, we found that the use of statins did not significantly improve either in-hospital mortality or 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. In the low-dose group, there were fewer quality multicenter studies; hence, conclusions based on the results of this subgroup are limited.

Indexed as

High doselow dosemortalitysepsisstatin

Identifiers

PMID27688630
PMCPMC5027747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.